Citrate Versus Citrate–Heparin Anticoagulation in <scp>HPC</scp> (A): Comparative Effects on Intra‐Apheresis Mobilization of <scp>CD34</scp> <sup>+</sup> Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells

Successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation relies on the collection of a sufficient number of CD34<sup>+</sup> hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). While acid citrate dextrose solution A (ACD-A) is a common anticoagulant (AC) for HPC apheresis [HPC(A)], recent evidence suggests that concomitant heparin may enhance intra-apheresis recruitment (IAR) of CD34<sup>+</sup> cells and improve collection efficiency. This study aimed to compare citrate-only and citrate-heparin protocols in routine HPC(A) procedures, with a focus on their effects on IAR and efficiency outcomes. A retrospective analysis was performed on 266 HPC(As) from 193 apheresis donors in autologous and allogeneic settings. Donor demographics, procedural parameters, and collection outcomes were compared between the ACD-A-only and ACD-A plus heparin protocols. The study endpoints included apheresis yield (AY/kg), collection efficiencies (CE<sub>1</sub>, CE<sub>2</sub>, and cruCE), recruitment ratio (RR), and performance ratio (PR). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests, effect sizes, and partial least squares (PLS) regression. Heparinized procedures demonstrated higher processed total blood volume ratios, lower AC volumes, and superior outcomes across CE<sub>1</sub> (83.8% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.00027), CE<sub>2</sub> (70.8% vs. 64.2%, p = 0.0055), cruCE (77.0% vs. 72.4%, p < 0.0001), RR (2.3 vs. 1.7, p < 0.0001), PR (239.3% vs. 208.2%, p < 0.0001), and AY/kg (6.75 vs. 5.23 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/kg, p = 0.0025). The effect size and PLS analyses confirmed the contribution of heparin as an adjunct AC enhancing multiple apheresis outcomes. In summary, citrate-heparin anticoagulation was found to be a feasible strategy that improved key collection efficiency and IAR metrics during HPC(A).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.70118
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citrate Versus Citrate–Heparin Anticoagulation in HPC (A): Comparative Effects on Intra‐Apheresis Mobilization of CD34 + Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells

Yendry Ventura‐Carmenate, Aseel Alsaid, Inas El‐Najjar, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo‐Hernandez et al.
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Citrate Versus Citrate–Heparin Anticoagulation in HPC (A): Comparative Effects on Intra‐Apheresis Mobilization of CD34 + Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells

Yendry Ventura‐Carmenate, Aseel Alsaid, Inas El‐Najjar, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo‐Hernandez, Shinnette Lumame, Fatema Mohammed Al‐Kaabi, Jayakumar David Dennison, Mansi Sachdev, Marlene Cato, Jay Mary Rose‐Roque, Carlos Agustin Villegas‐Valverde, Rene Antonio Rivero‐Jimenez, Yandy Marx Castillo‐Aleman, Mohamed Ibrahim Abu‐Haleeqa, Charisma Castelo, Sakher Ahmad Obeidat, Nameer Al‐Saadawi
article en

Abstract

Successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation relies on the collection of a sufficient number of CD34<sup>+</sup> hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). While acid citrate dextrose solution A (ACD-A) is a common anticoagulant (AC) for HPC apheresis [HPC(A)], recent evidence suggests that concomitant heparin may enhance intra-apheresis recruitment (IAR) of CD34<sup>+</sup> cells and improve collection efficiency. This study aimed to compare citrate-only and citrate-heparin protocols in routine HPC(A) procedures, with a focus on their effects on IAR and efficiency outcomes. A retrospective analysis was performed on 266 HPC(As) from 193 apheresis donors in autologous and allogeneic settings. Donor demographics, procedural parameters, and collection outcomes were compared between the ACD-A-only and ACD-A plus heparin protocols. The study endpoints included apheresis yield (AY/kg), collection efficiencies (CE<sub>1</sub>, CE<sub>2</sub>, and cruCE), recruitment ratio (RR), and performance ratio (PR). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests, effect sizes, and partial least squares (PLS) regression. Heparinized procedures demonstrated higher processed total blood volume ratios, lower AC volumes, and superior outcomes across CE<sub>1</sub> (83.8% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.00027), CE<sub>2</sub> (70.8% vs. 64.2%, p = 0.0055), cruCE (77.0% vs. 72.4%, p < 0.0001), RR (2.3 vs. 1.7, p < 0.0001), PR (239.3% vs. 208.2%, p < 0.0001), and AY/kg (6.75 vs. 5.23 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/kg, p = 0.0025). The effect size and PLS analyses confirmed the contribution of heparin as an adjunct AC enhancing multiple apheresis outcomes. In summary, citrate-heparin anticoagulation was found to be a feasible strategy that improved key collection efficiency and IAR metrics during HPC(A).

Journal of Clinical ApheresisVol. 41(2)
Abu Dhabi University (AE), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Shaikh Khalifa Medical City (AE), Abu Dhabi National Oil (United Arab Emirates) (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.