The effect of psychological flexibility and intolerance of uncertainty on decision-making styles in university students

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of psychological flexibility and intolerance of uncertainty on individuals' decision-making styles among university students. The study was designed as a correlational survey model, and data were collected from 381 university students aged 18-29. Participants completed the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, the Psychological Flexibility Scale, and the Rational and Intuitive Decision Making Styles Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used in the data analysis. The dependent variables of this study are the subdimensions of decision-making styles, namely rational decision making and intuitive decision making. The independent variables are the subdimensions of psychological flexibility, which include acceptance, being present, defusion, self as context, values, and committed action. The other independent variable are the subdimensions of intolerance of uncertainty, specifically future-oriented anxiety and inhibitory anxiety. According to the study's findings, the subdimensions of psychological flexibility —namely, values and committed action, being present, and defusion —along with the subdimension of intolerance of uncertainty, specifically future-oriented anxiety, significantly predicted rational decision-making. Furthermore, it was determined that the subdimensions of psychological flexibility, self as context, as well as values and committed action, are meaningful predictors of intuitive decision making. The research findings were discussed in the context of existing literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1713507
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of psychological flexibility and intolerance of uncertainty on decision-making styles in university students

Makbule Kalı Soyer, Ebru Talibe Turgut
Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
article

The effect of psychological flexibility and intolerance of uncertainty on decision-making styles in university students

Makbule Kalı Soyer, Ebru Talibe Turgut
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of psychological flexibility and intolerance of uncertainty on individuals' decision-making styles among university students. The study was designed as a correlational survey model, and data were collected from 381 university students aged 18-29. Participants completed the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, the Psychological Flexibility Scale, and the Rational and Intuitive Decision Making Styles Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used in the data analysis. The dependent variables of this study are the subdimensions of decision-making styles, namely rational decision making and intuitive decision making. The independent variables are the subdimensions of psychological flexibility, which include acceptance, being present, defusion, self as context, values, and committed action. The other independent variable are the subdimensions of intolerance of uncertainty, specifically future-oriented anxiety and inhibitory anxiety. According to the study's findings, the subdimensions of psychological flexibility —namely, values and committed action, being present, and defusion —along with the subdimension of intolerance of uncertainty, specifically future-oriented anxiety, significantly predicted rational decision-making. Furthermore, it was determined that the subdimensions of psychological flexibility, self as context, as well as values and committed action, are meaningful predictors of intuitive decision making. The research findings were discussed in the context of existing literature.

Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri DergisiVol. 14(1)
Istanbul Health and Technology University, Marmara University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.