The cost of sodium‑zinc molten salt batteries for grid-scale energy storage

Decarbonising power grids requires affordable storage to accommodate surplus wind and solar electricity over periods of hours to days. Batteries made from abundant elements offer a scalable solution. High-temperature molten salt devices such as sodium‑nickel-chloride (Na-NiCl 2 ) batteries are commercial, but their cost remains a barrier. Replacing nickel with cheaper zinc could enable the needed savings, but the techno-economic potential of sodium–zinc (Na–Zn) batteries remains untested. We present the first cost and performance assessment of a solid-electrolyte Na-ZnCl 2 battery. Using a bottom-up engineering model and Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, we find a baseline 240-cell module achieves project-level capital costs of 246–273 USD per kWh capacity, and a levelised cost of storage (LCOS) of 164–195 USD per MWh delivered, if 2030 performance targets are met. These values undercut 2024 prices for stationary lithium-ion systems, and increasing cell capacity to 1.1 kWh or enlarging modules to 15,360 cells lowers LCOS by up to 30%, competitive with leading 4-hour lithium-ion forecasts. Sensitivity analysis shows manufacturing scale and inactive-material reduction outweigh raw-material price in driving cost, challenging the view that cheap zinc alone guarantees competitiveness. Our results provide a clear R&D roadmap and position sodium‑zinc batteries as a mineral-lean complement to lithium-ion for reliable, long-duration, grid-scale energy storage. • First techno-economic study of sodium–zinc chloride battery modules • Baseline module achieves 164–195 USD/MWh lifetime cost, beating 2024 lithium-ion. • Increasing module or cell size could reduce costs by 7–14%, matching 2030 Li-ion. • Manufacturing scale and design, not zinc price, dominates cost drivers. • We map an R&D path to mineral-lean, long-duration storage for clean grids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.121663
Primary Topic
Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cost of sodium‑zinc molten salt batteries for grid-scale energy storage

Chanwith Buntoengpesuchsakul, Iain Staffell, Norbert Weber, Meike V.F. Heinz et al.
Journal of Energy Storage
Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
article

The cost of sodium‑zinc molten salt batteries for grid-scale energy storage

Chanwith Buntoengpesuchsakul, Iain Staffell, Norbert Weber, Meike V.F. Heinz, Nathan Johnson, Oliver Schmidt
article en

Abstract

Decarbonising power grids requires affordable storage to accommodate surplus wind and solar electricity over periods of hours to days. Batteries made from abundant elements offer a scalable solution. High-temperature molten salt devices such as sodium‑nickel-chloride (Na-NiCl 2 ) batteries are commercial, but their cost remains a barrier. Replacing nickel with cheaper zinc could enable the needed savings, but the techno-economic potential of sodium–zinc (Na–Zn) batteries remains untested. We present the first cost and performance assessment of a solid-electrolyte Na-ZnCl 2 battery. Using a bottom-up engineering model and Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, we find a baseline 240-cell module achieves project-level capital costs of 246–273 USD per kWh capacity, and a levelised cost of storage (LCOS) of 164–195 USD per MWh delivered, if 2030 performance targets are met. These values undercut 2024 prices for stationary lithium-ion systems, and increasing cell capacity to 1.1 kWh or enlarging modules to 15,360 cells lowers LCOS by up to 30%, competitive with leading 4-hour lithium-ion forecasts. Sensitivity analysis shows manufacturing scale and inactive-material reduction outweigh raw-material price in driving cost, challenging the view that cheap zinc alone guarantees competitiveness. Our results provide a clear R&D roadmap and position sodium‑zinc batteries as a mineral-lean complement to lithium-ion for reliable, long-duration, grid-scale energy storage. • First techno-economic study of sodium–zinc chloride battery modules • Baseline module achieves 164–195 USD/MWh lifetime cost, beating 2024 lithium-ion. • Increasing module or cell size could reduce costs by 7–14%, matching 2030 Li-ion. • Manufacturing scale and design, not zinc price, dominates cost drivers. • We map an R&D path to mineral-lean, long-duration storage for clean grids.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 159
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE), Imperial College London (GB), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.