Rethinking social capital in wildfire resilience: the case of central Portugal

This article explores the role of social capital in wildfire resilience and is based on case study research in central Portugal. Given the recent revival of the concept across disciplines to explain how communities can cope with hazards, we critically analyse social capital through a social network analysis perspective, introducing an innovative methodological approach. By focusing on the socio-cultural structures that influence preventive and recovery capacities, two rural communities were assessed and compared to understand the conditions under which social networks operate. The results confirm the importance of bridging and linking ties but reveal the need for shared collective norms and values to sustain preparedness and recovery initiatives, especially when institutional risk management systems fail. We argue that the context in which social capital is activated reflects the socio-political dimensions of wildfires and sheds light on the overlooked efforts of rural communities to resist their relegated status as second-class citizens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disasters
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.70050
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking social capital in wildfire resilience: the case of central Portugal

Cíntia Fachada, José Manuel Mendes
Disasters
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Rethinking social capital in wildfire resilience: the case of central Portugal

Cíntia Fachada, José Manuel Mendes
article en

Abstract

This article explores the role of social capital in wildfire resilience and is based on case study research in central Portugal. Given the recent revival of the concept across disciplines to explain how communities can cope with hazards, we critically analyse social capital through a social network analysis perspective, introducing an innovative methodological approach. By focusing on the socio-cultural structures that influence preventive and recovery capacities, two rural communities were assessed and compared to understand the conditions under which social networks operate. The results confirm the importance of bridging and linking ties but reveal the need for shared collective norms and values to sustain preparedness and recovery initiatives, especially when institutional risk management systems fail. We argue that the context in which social capital is activated reflects the socio-political dimensions of wildfires and sheds light on the overlooked efforts of rural communities to resist their relegated status as second-class citizens.

DisastersVol. 50(3)
University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.