Suffering, critical illness, and radical bodily doubt

How can we understand critical illness and suffering more generally? In this piece I offer three thoughts on this question. First, one’s relationship to one’s body is radically disrupted in illness in ways that are important to philosophically study and articulate (for example, using phenomenology). This can help reveal the realities of such extreme suffering. Second, understanding this disruption is crucial to our ability to understand and articulate illness experiences, both within and beyond healthcare contexts. Third, we ought to militate against a ‘bright-siding’ culture that shrinks the interpersonal spaces and communicative possibilities to speak of suffering, trauma, pain and illness. Both phenomenology as a method and the study of epistemic injustice in healthcare are significant ways of opening further spaces for such communicative efforts, that may jointly promote health justice, epistemic justice, and the ability to speak of what are currently largely unspeakable experiences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suffering, critical illness, and radical bodily doubt

Havi Carel
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Suffering, critical illness, and radical bodily doubt

Havi Carel
article en

Abstract

How can we understand critical illness and suffering more generally? In this piece I offer three thoughts on this question. First, one’s relationship to one’s body is radically disrupted in illness in ways that are important to philosophically study and articulate (for example, using phenomenology). This can help reveal the realities of such extreme suffering. Second, understanding this disruption is crucial to our ability to understand and articulate illness experiences, both within and beyond healthcare contexts. Third, we ought to militate against a ‘bright-siding’ culture that shrinks the interpersonal spaces and communicative possibilities to speak of suffering, trauma, pain and illness. Both phenomenology as a method and the study of epistemic injustice in healthcare are significant ways of opening further spaces for such communicative efforts, that may jointly promote health justice, epistemic justice, and the ability to speak of what are currently largely unspeakable experiences.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.