Does Culture Affect Sustainability Outcomes? : A comparative case study of Sweden & Japan

This thesis investigates how national cultural differences influence corporate sustainability outcomes by comparing large firms in Sweden and Japan. Drawing on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and Hall’s context theory, the study combines analysis of quantitative indicators of environmental, social, and economic sustainability from corporate reports with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews. The results show that cultural traits such as hierarchy, risk tolerance, and communication context shape not only how firms pursue sustainability, but also how outcomes are reported and interpreted. Sweden’s low power distance and individualism foster transparency and participation, while Japan’s high uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation promote disciplined, incremental efficiency improvements embedded in organizational routines. Together, these findings position culture as an explanatory mechanism behind some degree of observed differences in sustainability outcomes and reporting asymmetries. The study contributes to cross-cultural management and sustainability literature by bridging cultural theory with measurable company-level outcomes, and offers practical insights for investors and policymakers seeking to interpret sustainability performance across diverse cultural contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA (Linkoping University)
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Culture Affect Sustainability Outcomes? : A comparative case study of Sweden & Japan

Femic Pelle, Mohajer Soltani Aria
DiVA (Linkoping University)
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Does Culture Affect Sustainability Outcomes? : A comparative case study of Sweden & Japan

Femic Pelle, Mohajer Soltani Aria
article en

Abstract

This thesis investigates how national cultural differences influence corporate sustainability outcomes by comparing large firms in Sweden and Japan. Drawing on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and Hall’s context theory, the study combines analysis of quantitative indicators of environmental, social, and economic sustainability from corporate reports with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews. The results show that cultural traits such as hierarchy, risk tolerance, and communication context shape not only how firms pursue sustainability, but also how outcomes are reported and interpreted. Sweden’s low power distance and individualism foster transparency and participation, while Japan’s high uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation promote disciplined, incremental efficiency improvements embedded in organizational routines. Together, these findings position culture as an explanatory mechanism behind some degree of observed differences in sustainability outcomes and reporting asymmetries. The study contributes to cross-cultural management and sustainability literature by bridging cultural theory with measurable company-level outcomes, and offers practical insights for investors and policymakers seeking to interpret sustainability performance across diverse cultural contexts.

DiVA (Linkoping University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Culture Affect Sustainability Outcomes? : A comparative case study of Sweden & Japan — Femic Pelle, Mohajer Soltani Aria · DiVA (Linkoping University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS