From safe havens to death traps: the EU’s migrationexternalisation and the processual and plastic stages of genocide

Can genocide be reimagined beyond its static legal form and singular rupture? This chapter advances a threefold theoretical and empirical framework to interrogate the externalisation–genocide nexus, offering a processual, plastic, and politically charged understanding of genocide at sea. Rather than treating genocide as an extraordinary aberration, we trace how it unfolds through slow, bureaucratised, and racialised migration control regimes that externalise state functions and obscure responsibility. Genocide, we argue, is not a fixed category but a mutable assemblage, continually reconfigured through its (non-)operationalisation by shifting constellations of actors, infrastructures, and legal logics. Drawing on critical legal scholarship, criminology, and migration studies, the chapter addresses a striking conceptual silence: the reluctance to invoke genocide even where regimes of structural violence and coercive exclusion are laid bare. In tracing the entanglement of genocide and the ocean, the chapter confronts the sea not as empty expanse, but as a juridical void where bodies vanish, responsibility dissolves, and violence drifts unclaimed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CentAUR (University of Reading)
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From safe havens to death traps: the EU’s migrationexternalisation and the processual and plastic stages of genocide

Rosa Walling-Wefelmeyer, Vicky Kapogianni
CentAUR (University of Reading)
International Law and Human Rights
article

From safe havens to death traps: the EU’s migrationexternalisation and the processual and plastic stages of genocide

Rosa Walling-Wefelmeyer, Vicky Kapogianni
article en

Abstract

Can genocide be reimagined beyond its static legal form and singular rupture? This chapter advances a threefold theoretical and empirical framework to interrogate the externalisation–genocide nexus, offering a processual, plastic, and politically charged understanding of genocide at sea. Rather than treating genocide as an extraordinary aberration, we trace how it unfolds through slow, bureaucratised, and racialised migration control regimes that externalise state functions and obscure responsibility. Genocide, we argue, is not a fixed category but a mutable assemblage, continually reconfigured through its (non-)operationalisation by shifting constellations of actors, infrastructures, and legal logics. Drawing on critical legal scholarship, criminology, and migration studies, the chapter addresses a striking conceptual silence: the reluctance to invoke genocide even where regimes of structural violence and coercive exclusion are laid bare. In tracing the entanglement of genocide and the ocean, the chapter confronts the sea not as empty expanse, but as a juridical void where bodies vanish, responsibility dissolves, and violence drifts unclaimed.

CentAUR (University of Reading)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.