AI-simulated reciprocity and the narrowing of decision options within human attachment psychological architecture

This paper examines how regular interaction with artificial intelligence systems that simulate reciprocal conversation may influence the cognitive structure of attachment-related decision-making. Drawing on attachment theory, behavioural economics, and social exchange theory, the study explores how AI-mediated interaction may gradually reshape the way individuals evaluate relational uncertainty, vulnerability, and commitment. The analysis identifies three structural mechanisms through which AI-simulated reciprocity may affect attachment-related decision processes: reward without vulnerability, synthetic reciprocity without agency, and the narrowing of perceived decision options. In human relationships, emotional validation and reciprocity are typically contingent upon vulnerability, negotiation, and effort, creating a probabilistic reward structure that sustains relational investment. AI systems, however, can provide immediate and consistent validation without requiring reciprocal emotional exposure or interpersonal cost. At the same time, AI interactions simulate responsiveness linguistically while lacking intentional agency or relational investment. Repeated exposure to these patterns may alter expectations regarding responsiveness, effort, and emotional regulation in human relationships. In addition, AI-generated guidance often frames relational problems through simplified and structured decision pathways, which behavioural research suggests can limit the range of alternatives cognitively considered by individuals. The paper argues that these mechanisms may collectively narrow the perceived decision space within the psychological architecture of attachment, potentially influencing how individuals interpret relational conflict, evaluate commitment, and tolerate ambiguity. The study does not claim that AI eliminates human attachment capacity; rather, it proposes that repeated exposure to structured AI interaction may recalibrate the evaluative conditions under which attachment-related decisions are formed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-03-01
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-simulated reciprocity and the narrowing of decision options within human attachment psychological architecture

Dumitru Alexandru BODISLAV, Raluca Iuliana GEORGESCU
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

AI-simulated reciprocity and the narrowing of decision options within human attachment psychological architecture

Dumitru Alexandru BODISLAV, Raluca Iuliana GEORGESCU
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how regular interaction with artificial intelligence systems that simulate reciprocal conversation may influence the cognitive structure of attachment-related decision-making. Drawing on attachment theory, behavioural economics, and social exchange theory, the study explores how AI-mediated interaction may gradually reshape the way individuals evaluate relational uncertainty, vulnerability, and commitment. The analysis identifies three structural mechanisms through which AI-simulated reciprocity may affect attachment-related decision processes: reward without vulnerability, synthetic reciprocity without agency, and the narrowing of perceived decision options. In human relationships, emotional validation and reciprocity are typically contingent upon vulnerability, negotiation, and effort, creating a probabilistic reward structure that sustains relational investment. AI systems, however, can provide immediate and consistent validation without requiring reciprocal emotional exposure or interpersonal cost. At the same time, AI interactions simulate responsiveness linguistically while lacking intentional agency or relational investment. Repeated exposure to these patterns may alter expectations regarding responsiveness, effort, and emotional regulation in human relationships. In addition, AI-generated guidance often frames relational problems through simplified and structured decision pathways, which behavioural research suggests can limit the range of alternatives cognitively considered by individuals. The paper argues that these mechanisms may collectively narrow the perceived decision space within the psychological architecture of attachment, potentially influencing how individuals interpret relational conflict, evaluate commitment, and tolerate ambiguity. The study does not claim that AI eliminates human attachment capacity; rather, it proposes that repeated exposure to structured AI interaction may recalibrate the evaluative conditions under which attachment-related decisions are formed.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Engineering Associates (United States) (US), Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.