GenAI as a coding partner: Productivity gains at the cost of sustainability and maintenance

Generative AI solutions like GitHub Copilot have been shown to increase the productivity of software developers. Yet prior work remains unclear on the quality of code produced and the challenges of maintaining it in software projects. If quality declines as volume grows, experienced (core) developers face increased work-loads reviewing and reworking code from less-experienced (peripheral) contributors. We analyze developer activity in Open Source Software (OSS) projects following the introduction of GitHub Copilot. We find that productivity indeed increases. However, the increase in productivity is primarily driven by peripheral developers. We also find that code written after the adoption of AI requires more rework. Importantly, the added rework burden falls on core developers, who review 6.5% more code after Copilot’s introduction, leading to a 19% drop in their original code productivity. More broadly, this finding raises caution that productivity gains of AI may mask the growing burden of maintenance on a shrinking pool of experts.<br/>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research portal (Tilburg University)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GenAI as a coding partner: Productivity gains at the cost of sustainability and maintenance

Murat; id_orcid 0000-0002-4368-3986 Tunç, Jan C.; id_orcid 0000-0001-7220-0851 Fransoo, Feiyang (Amber); id_orcid 0009-0009-6059-7236 Xu, Poonacha; id_orcid 0000-0001-8872-6161 Medappa et al.
Research portal (Tilburg University)
Software Engineering Research
article

GenAI as a coding partner: Productivity gains at the cost of sustainability and maintenance

Murat; id_orcid 0000-0002-4368-3986 Tunç, Jan C.; id_orcid 0000-0001-7220-0851 Fransoo, Feiyang (Amber); id_orcid 0009-0009-6059-7236 Xu, Poonacha; id_orcid 0000-0001-8872-6161 Medappa, Martijn; id_orcid 0009-0008-3428-9320 Vroegindeweij
article en

Abstract

Generative AI solutions like GitHub Copilot have been shown to increase the productivity of software developers. Yet prior work remains unclear on the quality of code produced and the challenges of maintaining it in software projects. If quality declines as volume grows, experienced (core) developers face increased work-loads reviewing and reworking code from less-experienced (peripheral) contributors. We analyze developer activity in Open Source Software (OSS) projects following the introduction of GitHub Copilot. We find that productivity indeed increases. However, the increase in productivity is primarily driven by peripheral developers. We also find that code written after the adoption of AI requires more rework. Importantly, the added rework burden falls on core developers, who review 6.5% more code after Copilot’s introduction, leading to a 19% drop in their original code productivity. More broadly, this finding raises caution that productivity gains of AI may mask the growing burden of maintenance on a shrinking pool of experts.<br/>

Research portal (Tilburg University)
Health Information Management (BE), MTS Systems (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.