Managing water resources and aquatic invaders: Public preferences, stakeholder perspectives, and policy implications

Abstract Aquatic invasive species threaten water resources by reducing biodiversity, disrupting ecosystems, and impeding recreation. Managing these invaders is challenging due to public concerns over chemical control methods and conflicting stakeholder preferences. In this paper, we evaluate stakeholder preferences for aquatic invasive species management and test the impact of information on management decisions. We find strong public support for mechanical harvesting and hybrid approaches over herbicide use, with preferences shaped by environmental concerns, pre‐existing beliefs, and recreational experiences. Anglers and waterfowlers demonstrate the highest willingness to pay for mechanical control methods. Scientifically validated information can ease public concerns about herbicide use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.70034
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing water resources and aquatic invaders: Public preferences, stakeholder perspectives, and policy implications

Candice M. Prince, James J. Leary, Olesya M. Savchenko, Abhishek Rajan
Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Managing water resources and aquatic invaders: Public preferences, stakeholder perspectives, and policy implications

Candice M. Prince, James J. Leary, Olesya M. Savchenko, Abhishek Rajan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aquatic invasive species threaten water resources by reducing biodiversity, disrupting ecosystems, and impeding recreation. Managing these invaders is challenging due to public concerns over chemical control methods and conflicting stakeholder preferences. In this paper, we evaluate stakeholder preferences for aquatic invasive species management and test the impact of information on management decisions. We find strong public support for mechanical harvesting and hybrid approaches over herbicide use, with preferences shaped by environmental concerns, pre‐existing beliefs, and recreational experiences. Anglers and waterfowlers demonstrate the highest willingness to pay for mechanical control methods. Scientifically validated information can ease public concerns about herbicide use.

Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
University of Florida (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.