Scalable biochar-enriched agriculture model assessing financial viability of the sustainable temporary use for brownfields: the Špitálka case

Introduction Brownfield sites present significant urban development challenges across Europe, often remaining unmanaged due to the substantial costs of physical restructuring and a lack of systematic funding, even for transitional uses. This research addresses the financing gap in temporary urban agricultural projects on brownfield sites. Specifically examining social farming and community garden models as vehicles for financial self-sufficiency, framed within the principles of a circular economy encompassing nutrient recycling, waste valorization, and extended land use cycles. Methods The study employs a simulation model based on life cycle costing and net present value to analyze project survival from the perspective of a municipal investor. The model was applied to the Špitálka brownfield site in Brno, Czechia, as a linearly scalable case study. The analysis integrates diverse revenue streams, including voluntary carbon certificate markets, various national and EU subsidy programs, and raised bed rental revenue. The economic viability of installing raised garden beds containing biochar-enriched soil was evaluated across two project variants: a Social Farming model and a Community Garden model. Results The results indicate that while carbon offsets are economically marginal, the strategic combination of labor and establishment subsidies is the decisive factor for financial survival. The Community Garden variant demonstrated a higher potential for self-sustainability (BCR > 1.0) due to its lower labor intensity and user rental income. Conversely, the Social Farming variant requires a subsidy of nearly 100% to achieve a break-even threshold (NPV = 0). Discussion While the Community Garden model shows stronger prospects for financial independence, the Social Farming variant serves as a vital social cohesion tool whose value extends beyond purely economic metrics. The findings provide a framework for municipalities to temporarily transform abandoned post-industrial areas before their ultimate redevelopment into productive urban spaces that generate societal, environmental, and fiscal benefits. JEL classification R14, R52, Q24

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2026.1788048
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scalable biochar-enriched agriculture model assessing financial viability of the sustainable temporary use for brownfields: the Špitálka case

Ladislava Grochová, Veronika Solilová, Helena Dvořáčková, Marek Litzman
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
article

Scalable biochar-enriched agriculture model assessing financial viability of the sustainable temporary use for brownfields: the Špitálka case

Ladislava Grochová, Veronika Solilová, Helena Dvořáčková, Marek Litzman
article en

Abstract

Introduction Brownfield sites present significant urban development challenges across Europe, often remaining unmanaged due to the substantial costs of physical restructuring and a lack of systematic funding, even for transitional uses. This research addresses the financing gap in temporary urban agricultural projects on brownfield sites. Specifically examining social farming and community garden models as vehicles for financial self-sufficiency, framed within the principles of a circular economy encompassing nutrient recycling, waste valorization, and extended land use cycles. Methods The study employs a simulation model based on life cycle costing and net present value to analyze project survival from the perspective of a municipal investor. The model was applied to the Špitálka brownfield site in Brno, Czechia, as a linearly scalable case study. The analysis integrates diverse revenue streams, including voluntary carbon certificate markets, various national and EU subsidy programs, and raised bed rental revenue. The economic viability of installing raised garden beds containing biochar-enriched soil was evaluated across two project variants: a Social Farming model and a Community Garden model. Results The results indicate that while carbon offsets are economically marginal, the strategic combination of labor and establishment subsidies is the decisive factor for financial survival. The Community Garden variant demonstrated a higher potential for self-sustainability (BCR > 1.0) due to its lower labor intensity and user rental income. Conversely, the Social Farming variant requires a subsidy of nearly 100% to achieve a break-even threshold (NPV = 0). Discussion While the Community Garden model shows stronger prospects for financial independence, the Social Farming variant serves as a vital social cohesion tool whose value extends beyond purely economic metrics. The findings provide a framework for municipalities to temporarily transform abandoned post-industrial areas before their ultimate redevelopment into productive urban spaces that generate societal, environmental, and fiscal benefits. JEL classification R14, R52, Q24

Frontiers in Sustainable CitiesVol. 8
Mendel University in Brno (CZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.