Dosimetric intercomparison for stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

Background and purpose: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) delivers high doses with submillimeter precision to small targets, requiring accuracy in both dose calculation and delivery.This study aimed to perform a dosimetric intercomparison of SRT accuracy across multiple radiotherapy departments.Materials and methods: The study included 30 SRT plans submitted by 24 hospitals.A head phantom, equipped with Gafchromic EBT3 film and ion chamber inserts, was used for dose measurements.Invited institutions generated SRT treatment plans prescribing 30 Gy in 5 fractions to brain targets, following their clinical protocols.Point dose and planar dose measurements were carried out at each institution, then the measured doses were compared against those calculated by their respective treatment planning systems.Agreement between planned and measured dose was assessed, with gamma passing rates calculated using 5%/1 mm and 3%/1 mm criteria.Results: An average difference of 0.2% and a range of -4.1% to 4.3% between the ion chamber measured dose at the center of one of the targets and the calculated dose was found.For the 5%/1 mm global gamma criterion, all films achieved passing rates above 97%.All treatment devices showed sub-millimeter spatial dose delivery accuracy, with deviations under 1 mm between measured and planned dose.Conclusions: The results indicated clinically acceptable agreement between the calculated and delivered dose across all treatment delivery systems.This intercomparison provided an opportunity for radiotherapy departments to assess the quality of their SRT treatment planning and delivery and benchmark their performance against other institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100956
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric intercomparison for stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

Daniel Schmidhalter, Olivier Pisaturo, Sergejs Unterkirhers, Véronique Vallet et al.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Dosimetric intercomparison for stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

Daniel Schmidhalter, Olivier Pisaturo, Sergejs Unterkirhers, Véronique Vallet, Francesco Pupillo, Rachid Boucenna, Marie Fargier-Voiron, Martin Härtig, Stephan Klöck, David Jeller, Peter Pemler, Maud Jaccard, Sheeba Thengumpallil, Nathan Corradini, Tanja Hertel, Vincent Fave, Christian Tata, Sarah Ghandour, Harald Petermann, Matthias Guckenberger, Juan Miguel Nieto García, Sara Abdollahi, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Natacha Ruiz López, Nicolaus Andratschke, Krayenbühl Jérôme, Cécile Chatelain, Patrick Weber
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) delivers high doses with submillimeter precision to small targets, requiring accuracy in both dose calculation and delivery.This study aimed to perform a dosimetric intercomparison of SRT accuracy across multiple radiotherapy departments.Materials and methods: The study included 30 SRT plans submitted by 24 hospitals.A head phantom, equipped with Gafchromic EBT3 film and ion chamber inserts, was used for dose measurements.Invited institutions generated SRT treatment plans prescribing 30 Gy in 5 fractions to brain targets, following their clinical protocols.Point dose and planar dose measurements were carried out at each institution, then the measured doses were compared against those calculated by their respective treatment planning systems.Agreement between planned and measured dose was assessed, with gamma passing rates calculated using 5%/1 mm and 3%/1 mm criteria.Results: An average difference of 0.2% and a range of -4.1% to 4.3% between the ion chamber measured dose at the center of one of the targets and the calculated dose was found.For the 5%/1 mm global gamma criterion, all films achieved passing rates above 97%.All treatment devices showed sub-millimeter spatial dose delivery accuracy, with deviations under 1 mm between measured and planned dose.Conclusions: The results indicated clinically acceptable agreement between the calculated and delivered dose across all treatment delivery systems.This intercomparison provided an opportunity for radiotherapy departments to assess the quality of their SRT treatment planning and delivery and benchmark their performance against other institutions.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
University of Bern (CH), Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH), Triemli Hospital (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Hôpital Beau-Séjour (CH), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH), Hirslanden Clinique Bois-Cerf (CH), Klinik Hirslanden (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Clinique de Genolier (CH), International Museum of Horology (CH), Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH), Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes (CH), Réseau Fribourgeois de Santé Mentale (CH), Theological Seminary Bienenberg (CH), Clinique de La Source (CH), St. Claraspital (CH), Lindenhofspital (CH), Hôpital Riviera-Chablais (CH), Hôpital de la Tour (CH), Générale-Beaulieu Clinic (CH), Clinica Luganese Moncucco (CH), Spitalzentrum Centre hospitalier Biel- Bienne (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.