A comprehensive diagnostic model for tuberculous PE: integration of clinical and immunological biomarkers

Background Tuberculous pleurisy represents a prevalent form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and constitutes a significant diagnostic challenge in clinical practice, particularly in endemic regions where it accounts for approximately 20–30% of all PEs. The nonspecific clinical presentation and the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods—including the low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround time of pleural fluid culture—often result in delayed diagnosis and treatment, potentially compromising patient outcomes. Objective To develop and validate a comprehensive, evidence-based predictive model that integrates readily available clinical and immunological biomarkers to enhance the early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy, thereby supporting timely clinical decision-making and optimized patient management. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 523 consecutive patients presenting with PE at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2021, including 375 patients with confirmed tuberculous pleurisy and 148 with non-tuberculous effusions. Demographics, biochemical markers (adenosine deaminase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, D-dimer), immunological parameters (T-SPOT.TB, T-cell subsets), and clinical indicators were systematically evaluated. Statistical analyses encompassed descriptive and comparative tests, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Missing data were addressed using median imputation (Rivalta test, 4.4%) and case-wise deletion (T-cell subsets, 14.9%). Results Five independent predictors were significantly associated with tuberculous pleurisy: younger age, elevated adenosine deaminase, lower C-reactive protein, positive Rivalta test, and positive T-SPOT.TB result. The multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance (pseudo R 2 = 0.450) and strong model fit. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal adenosine deaminase cutoff of 30.5 U/L, yielding a sensitivity of 7.1%. Model robustness was further confirmed through rigorous internal validation. Conclusion This study presents a robust and clinically applicable diagnostic model that effectively distinguishes tuberculous pleurisy from non-tuberculous PEs by integrating multiple routinely available biomarkers. The model offers a practical, cost-effective tool for early diagnosis, with the potential to improve therapeutic timeliness and patient outcomes across varied healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1777931
Primary Topic
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive diagnostic model for tuberculous PE: integration of clinical and immunological biomarkers

Huanqing Liu, Jianying Li, Qian Lei, Zhuhong You et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
article

A comprehensive diagnostic model for tuberculous PE: integration of clinical and immunological biomarkers

Huanqing Liu, Jianying Li, Qian Lei, Zhuhong You, Guolian Zhao, Tingting Li
article en

Abstract

Background Tuberculous pleurisy represents a prevalent form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and constitutes a significant diagnostic challenge in clinical practice, particularly in endemic regions where it accounts for approximately 20–30% of all PEs. The nonspecific clinical presentation and the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods—including the low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround time of pleural fluid culture—often result in delayed diagnosis and treatment, potentially compromising patient outcomes. Objective To develop and validate a comprehensive, evidence-based predictive model that integrates readily available clinical and immunological biomarkers to enhance the early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy, thereby supporting timely clinical decision-making and optimized patient management. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 523 consecutive patients presenting with PE at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2021, including 375 patients with confirmed tuberculous pleurisy and 148 with non-tuberculous effusions. Demographics, biochemical markers (adenosine deaminase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, D-dimer), immunological parameters (T-SPOT.TB, T-cell subsets), and clinical indicators were systematically evaluated. Statistical analyses encompassed descriptive and comparative tests, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Missing data were addressed using median imputation (Rivalta test, 4.4%) and case-wise deletion (T-cell subsets, 14.9%). Results Five independent predictors were significantly associated with tuberculous pleurisy: younger age, elevated adenosine deaminase, lower C-reactive protein, positive Rivalta test, and positive T-SPOT.TB result. The multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance (pseudo R 2 = 0.450) and strong model fit. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal adenosine deaminase cutoff of 30.5 U/L, yielding a sensitivity of 7.1%. Model robustness was further confirmed through rigorous internal validation. Conclusion This study presents a robust and clinically applicable diagnostic model that effectively distinguishes tuberculous pleurisy from non-tuberculous PEs by integrating multiple routinely available biomarkers. The model offers a practical, cost-effective tool for early diagnosis, with the potential to improve therapeutic timeliness and patient outcomes across varied healthcare settings.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Xi'an Chest Hospital (CN), Northwestern Polytechnic University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.