Making space to listen: engaging people with a chronic condition and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers

Despite growing calls for patient and public involvement (PPI) to improve research relevance and inclusivity, it is still too often implemented in a tokenistic way. Health inequalities persist, and vulnerable populations, such as people with chronic conditions and/or limited health literacy (LHL), remain underrepresented as active participants in research. Factors contributing to this underrepresentation include complex research language, unfamiliar settings, and social stigma. To bridge the gap, this study aims to offer practical lessons that provide researchers and policymakers with concrete strategies for creating inclusive and effective research collaboration processes. A participatory action research approach was used, guided by the first three stages of the Participatory Research to Action (PR2A) framework: readiness, discover, and define. Data were collected across five group sessions with ten individuals with type 2 diabetes and various health literacy levels. The analysis focused on process-related data to explore recruitment, facilitation strategies, and participatory experiences. Effective recruitment relied on a multifaceted community outreach approach, combining online and offline channels, which improved group diversity. Clarifying expectations at the outset and balancing structure and flexibility supported meaningful contributions, and allowed sessions to be adapted to individual needs. This approach fostered factors central to motivation and group cohesion, including a collective purpose and mutual respect, while recognising the varied experiences of managing diabetes. Equitable engagement between citizen researchers and PPI facilitators was essential to valuing diverse perspectives and maintaining shared responsibility. Creative co-creation strategies, including sketching and small-group exercises, proved more effective in promoting accessible, inclusive engagement than text-based or plenary-only methods. The study demonstrates that recruiting and engaging citizens with type 2 diabetes and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers is feasible when conditions such as equitable partnership and engagement, clear expectations, and flexible structures are met. Creative co-creation strategies further support accessible and meaningful participation. These insights provide practical guidance for researchers seeking to implement inclusive PPI, contribute to reducing health inequalities, and inform the next stages of the PR2A framework for advancing participatory health research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Involvement and Engagement
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-026-00873-w
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making space to listen: engaging people with a chronic condition and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers

A. Elissen, D. Hertroijs, N. de Graef, D. Ruwaard et al.
Research Involvement and Engagement
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Making space to listen: engaging people with a chronic condition and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers

A. Elissen, D. Hertroijs, N. de Graef, D. Ruwaard, J. M. Cramm
article en

Abstract

Despite growing calls for patient and public involvement (PPI) to improve research relevance and inclusivity, it is still too often implemented in a tokenistic way. Health inequalities persist, and vulnerable populations, such as people with chronic conditions and/or limited health literacy (LHL), remain underrepresented as active participants in research. Factors contributing to this underrepresentation include complex research language, unfamiliar settings, and social stigma. To bridge the gap, this study aims to offer practical lessons that provide researchers and policymakers with concrete strategies for creating inclusive and effective research collaboration processes. A participatory action research approach was used, guided by the first three stages of the Participatory Research to Action (PR2A) framework: readiness, discover, and define. Data were collected across five group sessions with ten individuals with type 2 diabetes and various health literacy levels. The analysis focused on process-related data to explore recruitment, facilitation strategies, and participatory experiences. Effective recruitment relied on a multifaceted community outreach approach, combining online and offline channels, which improved group diversity. Clarifying expectations at the outset and balancing structure and flexibility supported meaningful contributions, and allowed sessions to be adapted to individual needs. This approach fostered factors central to motivation and group cohesion, including a collective purpose and mutual respect, while recognising the varied experiences of managing diabetes. Equitable engagement between citizen researchers and PPI facilitators was essential to valuing diverse perspectives and maintaining shared responsibility. Creative co-creation strategies, including sketching and small-group exercises, proved more effective in promoting accessible, inclusive engagement than text-based or plenary-only methods. The study demonstrates that recruiting and engaging citizens with type 2 diabetes and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers is feasible when conditions such as equitable partnership and engagement, clear expectations, and flexible structures are met. Creative co-creation strategies further support accessible and meaningful participation. These insights provide practical guidance for researchers seeking to implement inclusive PPI, contribute to reducing health inequalities, and inform the next stages of the PR2A framework for advancing participatory health research.

Research Involvement and Engagement
Tilburg University (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Department of Health (TW), Department of Health Services (NP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.