A qualitative systematic review of the implications of desexed language in women’s healthcare and healthcare literature
This review highlights the need for resources tailored to TGD individuals, clinician education on personalised language use and improvements to clinical documentation to ensure sex is always recorded, with gender identity included if relevant. Insufficient evidence exists to support universal implementation of desexed language in women's healthcare. Findings suggest it is not well understood or accepted by women who are not TGD and research is needed to understand its impact on wider groups.
Authors
- Naomi Black (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8869-606X)
- Majel McGranahan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5892-0729)
- Ciara Higley
- Abigail Greenfield
Institutions
- University of Warwick (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Women s Health
- Published
- 2026-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057261430199
- Primary Topic
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00