Blurred realities: Legal strategies for the deepfake era

This article examines the legal, regulatory and societal challenges posed by deepfake technology, situating its analysis within a comparative framework spanning the European Union, United States and China. It explores the multifaceted harms of deepfakes – from non-consensual pornography and political disinformation to financial fraud and identity manipulation – and analyses their rapid dissemination through online ecosystems that undermine both individual dignity and democratic trust. The study assesses the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, highlighting its transparency-based approach, definitional boundaries and classification of deepfake systems as ‘limited-risk’, while identifying contexts that may warrant high-risk or prohibited status. It underscores the limitations of transparency obligations in addressing malicious actors, cross-border disinformation and intimate image abuse, and examines the complementary roles of the Digital Services Act, the General Data Protection Regulation and the EU Directive on combating violence against women in regulating different stages of the deepfake lifecycle. Ultimately, the article argues for a multi-layered, adaptive governance model that reconciles the protection of rights, dignity and democratic integrity with the preservation of legitimate innovation in AI-driven creativity and communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x261433380
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blurred realities: Legal strategies for the deepfake era

Luca Ettore Perriello
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Blurred realities: Legal strategies for the deepfake era

Luca Ettore Perriello
article en

Abstract

This article examines the legal, regulatory and societal challenges posed by deepfake technology, situating its analysis within a comparative framework spanning the European Union, United States and China. It explores the multifaceted harms of deepfakes – from non-consensual pornography and political disinformation to financial fraud and identity manipulation – and analyses their rapid dissemination through online ecosystems that undermine both individual dignity and democratic trust. The study assesses the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, highlighting its transparency-based approach, definitional boundaries and classification of deepfake systems as ‘limited-risk’, while identifying contexts that may warrant high-risk or prohibited status. It underscores the limitations of transparency obligations in addressing malicious actors, cross-border disinformation and intimate image abuse, and examines the complementary roles of the Digital Services Act, the General Data Protection Regulation and the EU Directive on combating violence against women in regulating different stages of the deepfake lifecycle. Ultimately, the article argues for a multi-layered, adaptive governance model that reconciles the protection of rights, dignity and democratic integrity with the preservation of legitimate innovation in AI-driven creativity and communication.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.