Exploring alternative funding mechanisms to improve patient access to innovative medicines

Despite the existence of universal health coverage for citizens in Thailand, patient access to innovative medicines remains a challenge given the rapid pace of scientific development and high cost of new therapies. Thai policymakers currently focus almost exclusively on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and budget impact without considering flexibilities for decision-making. Payers are deprived of tools to manage financial and clinical uncertainties resulting in severely restricted access for patients. This research aims to identify the potential funding mechanisms and implementation approaches in the Thai context to improve access to high-cost innovative medicines. A research program was conducted in two phases; focus group discussions with 21 key stakeholders and further in-depth interviews with senior Thai key stakeholders. The first phase sought participants’ ranking of the top five selected financing mechanisms according to feasibility and attractiveness. The second phase utilized in-depth interviews to explore implementation approaches within the Thai context. Managed entry agreements (MEAs) and ring-fenced funding for innovative medicines were viewed favorably. These approaches were deemed easier to implement, providing an acceptable balance of risk and effort between all parties in the ecosystem and efficiently improving patients’ outcomes. High-cost innovative medicines for oncology, rare diseases, and life-threatening diseases with no alternative treatments were recommended as prioritized therapy areas for MEAs. A key priority is a need for a framework to implement MEAs into the current Thai health technology assessment (HTA) process. Additional key considerations included the need to integrate innovative funding mechanisms and establish pilot projects to test the viability of MEAs in Thailand. In conclusion, all participants acknowledged and endorsed using tangible financial-based solutions (MEAs and ring-fenced funding) for Thailand. Prioritizing equal access to innovative medicines by such initiatives will go a long way in promoting a healthier and more productive Thai society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14438-w
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring alternative funding mechanisms to improve patient access to innovative medicines

Chirayu Auewarakul, Puree Anantachoti, Jeonghoon 이민 Ahn, Omar Akhtar et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Exploring alternative funding mechanisms to improve patient access to innovative medicines

Chirayu Auewarakul, Puree Anantachoti, Jeonghoon 이민 Ahn, Omar Akhtar, Pichaya Suthipinijtham, Jomtana Siripaibun, Malvin Kang, A Gras, Nithi Mahanonda, Teerapat Ungtrakul
article en

Abstract

Despite the existence of universal health coverage for citizens in Thailand, patient access to innovative medicines remains a challenge given the rapid pace of scientific development and high cost of new therapies. Thai policymakers currently focus almost exclusively on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and budget impact without considering flexibilities for decision-making. Payers are deprived of tools to manage financial and clinical uncertainties resulting in severely restricted access for patients. This research aims to identify the potential funding mechanisms and implementation approaches in the Thai context to improve access to high-cost innovative medicines. A research program was conducted in two phases; focus group discussions with 21 key stakeholders and further in-depth interviews with senior Thai key stakeholders. The first phase sought participants’ ranking of the top five selected financing mechanisms according to feasibility and attractiveness. The second phase utilized in-depth interviews to explore implementation approaches within the Thai context. Managed entry agreements (MEAs) and ring-fenced funding for innovative medicines were viewed favorably. These approaches were deemed easier to implement, providing an acceptable balance of risk and effort between all parties in the ecosystem and efficiently improving patients’ outcomes. High-cost innovative medicines for oncology, rare diseases, and life-threatening diseases with no alternative treatments were recommended as prioritized therapy areas for MEAs. A key priority is a need for a framework to implement MEAs into the current Thai health technology assessment (HTA) process. Additional key considerations included the need to integrate innovative funding mechanisms and establish pilot projects to test the viability of MEAs in Thailand. In conclusion, all participants acknowledged and endorsed using tangible financial-based solutions (MEAs and ring-fenced funding) for Thailand. Prioritizing equal access to innovative medicines by such initiatives will go a long way in promoting a healthier and more productive Thai society.

BMC Health Services Research
Ewha Womans University (KR), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Image and Pervasive Access Laboratory (SG), Chulabhorn Hospital (TH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.