Development and Validation of a Consensus-Based Checklist for Regional Anesthesia: The LRA Checklist as a Tool for Safety, Standardization, and Value-Based Care

Background: Regional anesthesia is a fundamental aspect of contemporary perioperative care. However, variability in practice, incomplete documentation, and inconsistent safety protocols continue to pose preventable risks. Although there are international checklist models for regional anesthesia and perioperative safety such as those developed by ASRA, ESAIC, and the WHO, Italy does not have a nationally endorsed checklist that is consensus-based and specifically tailored to local terminology, workflows, and legal requirements. Methods: To address this gap, we developed an evidence-based Locoregional Anesthesia Checklist (LRA Checklist) using established frameworks for healthcare checklist design. The development process included a needs assessment through a national survey of ESRA Italy members, a review of existing models, item drafting, expert consensus, and endorsement by the Board. We assessed content validity through a modified Delphi process involving 15 experts from the ESRA Italian Chapter Board. Additionally, we created a theoretical impact model to estimate the potential organizational and economic effects of implementing the checklist, using baseline institutional parameters. Results: Consensus was achieved for all checklist domains after two Delphi rounds, with minor edits to improve clarity, usability, and clinical relevance. The theoretical model indicates that adopting checklists may help reduce preventable complications, improve workflow, enhance documentation and traceability, and provide overall benefits to institutions in various scenarios. Conclusions: In conclusion, the LRA Checklist is a structured, consensus-based tool tailored for the Italian context, aimed at promoting safer and more standardized practices in regional anesthesia. To our knowledge, no prior Italian national consensus or checklist specifically dedicated to regional anesthesia has been formally published. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to confirm its effectiveness in real-world settings and to quantify both clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14070867
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of a Consensus-Based Checklist for Regional Anesthesia: The LRA Checklist as a Tool for Safety, Standardization, and Value-Based Care

Antonio Clemente, Grazia De Angelis, Romualdo Del Buono, Paolo Grossi et al.
Healthcare
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Development and Validation of a Consensus-Based Checklist for Regional Anesthesia: The LRA Checklist as a Tool for Safety, Standardization, and Value-Based Care

Antonio Clemente, Grazia De Angelis, Romualdo Del Buono, Paolo Grossi, Gabriele Melegari, Domenico Pietro Santonastaso, Enrico Barbara, Valeria Mossetti, Giuseppe Lubrano, Fabrizio Fattorini, Mario Tedesco, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Raffaele Russo, Mauro Proietti Pannunzi, Mario Bosco, Marco Scardino, Fabio Gori, Fabio Costa, Andrea Tognù
article en

Abstract

Background: Regional anesthesia is a fundamental aspect of contemporary perioperative care. However, variability in practice, incomplete documentation, and inconsistent safety protocols continue to pose preventable risks. Although there are international checklist models for regional anesthesia and perioperative safety such as those developed by ASRA, ESAIC, and the WHO, Italy does not have a nationally endorsed checklist that is consensus-based and specifically tailored to local terminology, workflows, and legal requirements. Methods: To address this gap, we developed an evidence-based Locoregional Anesthesia Checklist (LRA Checklist) using established frameworks for healthcare checklist design. The development process included a needs assessment through a national survey of ESRA Italy members, a review of existing models, item drafting, expert consensus, and endorsement by the Board. We assessed content validity through a modified Delphi process involving 15 experts from the ESRA Italian Chapter Board. Additionally, we created a theoretical impact model to estimate the potential organizational and economic effects of implementing the checklist, using baseline institutional parameters. Results: Consensus was achieved for all checklist domains after two Delphi rounds, with minor edits to improve clarity, usability, and clinical relevance. The theoretical model indicates that adopting checklists may help reduce preventable complications, improve workflow, enhance documentation and traceability, and provide overall benefits to institutions in various scenarios. Conclusions: In conclusion, the LRA Checklist is a structured, consensus-based tool tailored for the Italian context, aimed at promoting safer and more standardized practices in regional anesthesia. To our knowledge, no prior Italian national consensus or checklist specifically dedicated to regional anesthesia has been formally published. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to confirm its effectiveness in real-world settings and to quantify both clinical and economic outcomes.

HealthcareVol. 14(7)
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT), Mater Dei Hospital (MT), ASL Roma (IT), L'organizzazione Ospedale di Civitanova M (IT), Casa di Cura San Michele (IT), Ospedale di Santo Spirito (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana (IT), Humanitas Mater Domini (IT), Ospedale Regina Margherita (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Misericordia University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.