A study on the impact of open doors: investigating the influence of short leave and open prison on recidivism rates

This study examines whether gradual release measures, specifically open prisons and unsupervised short leave, reduce recidivism among former inmates. Data from 907 released prisoners were analyzed. Conditional inference forests and statistical balancing methods were used to control for confounding variables, and survival models estimated effects on general recidivism and new prison sentences. Open prisons were associated with substantially lower risks of both general recidivism (HRs ≈ 0.66–0.72) and new prison sentences (HRs ≈ 0.48–0.52). Evidence for the effect of unsupervised short leave was less consistent, though analyses indicated a reduced likelihood of general recidivism for eligible inmates (HRATT = 0.72). Findings suggest that open prisons are an effective rehabilitation measure, whereas the impact of unsupervised short leave remains uncertain. Results underscore the value of careful confounding adjustment and indicate that gradual release programs can support reintegration and reduce reoffending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-026-09741-9
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on the impact of open doors: investigating the influence of short leave and open prison on recidivism rates

Helena Schüttler, Merten Neumann, Thimna Klatt
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

A study on the impact of open doors: investigating the influence of short leave and open prison on recidivism rates

Helena Schüttler, Merten Neumann, Thimna Klatt
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether gradual release measures, specifically open prisons and unsupervised short leave, reduce recidivism among former inmates. Data from 907 released prisoners were analyzed. Conditional inference forests and statistical balancing methods were used to control for confounding variables, and survival models estimated effects on general recidivism and new prison sentences. Open prisons were associated with substantially lower risks of both general recidivism (HRs ≈ 0.66–0.72) and new prison sentences (HRs ≈ 0.48–0.52). Evidence for the effect of unsupervised short leave was less consistent, though analyses indicated a reduced likelihood of general recidivism for eligible inmates (HRATT = 0.72). Findings suggest that open prisons are an effective rehabilitation measure, whereas the impact of unsupervised short leave remains uncertain. Results underscore the value of careful confounding adjustment and indicate that gradual release programs can support reintegration and reduce reoffending.

Journal of Experimental Criminology
Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.