Alternatives to animal models in gastroenterology and hepatology research

The accurate definition of in vivo , ex vivo and in vitro models is critical for the whole R&D process, i.e., basic research, clinical translation and reliability of results. Although many models are currently being developed, it is important to recognize the limitations and advantages of each of them. The aim of this review is to compile the most important alternatives to animal models in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology research. A thorough comparison and understanding of each alternative model will certainly save time and money and will lead to better predictability and reliability of results for clinical translation and clinical trials. There is no single model capable of replacing the complexity of human biology. Nevertheless, it is essential to understand the fundamentals of human anatomy, physiology and disease pathophysiology to select the most appropriate model in translational research. At the same time, the appropriate model must be selected to gain a deeper understanding of the principal processes underlying human physiology and the pathology of diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1789616
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternatives to animal models in gastroenterology and hepatology research

Anna P. Kipp, Alina Löser, A. Geisler, Elena Gardey et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Alternatives to animal models in gastroenterology and hepatology research

Anna P. Kipp, Alina Löser, A. Geisler, Elena Gardey, Andreas Stallmach, Maria Witt-Wallert, Stefan Lorkowski
article en

Abstract

The accurate definition of in vivo , ex vivo and in vitro models is critical for the whole R&D process, i.e., basic research, clinical translation and reliability of results. Although many models are currently being developed, it is important to recognize the limitations and advantages of each of them. The aim of this review is to compile the most important alternatives to animal models in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology research. A thorough comparison and understanding of each alternative model will certainly save time and money and will lead to better predictability and reliability of results for clinical translation and clinical trials. There is no single model capable of replacing the complexity of human biology. Nevertheless, it is essential to understand the fundamentals of human anatomy, physiology and disease pathophysiology to select the most appropriate model in translational research. At the same time, the appropriate model must be selected to gain a deeper understanding of the principal processes underlying human physiology and the pathology of diseases.

Frontiers in PharmacologyVol. 17
Jena University Hospital (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.