SRS289 - Optimising engagement and implementation in cluster randomised controlled trials: insights from CLARITY

Abstract Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating clinical interventions. However, in practice, many RCTs face challenges achieving consistent delivery across sites, risking under-recruitment, protocol deviations, and reduced validity. Strategies to support effective implementation are therefore essential for optimising intervention uptake and producing reliable evidence in busy healthcare environments. As a pragmatic cluster RCT involving emergency surgical teams as participants, CLARITY presents an opportunity to assess these strategies. Aim We aimed to identify and characterise practical strategies for improving site engagement with CLARITY (ISRCTN: 16757238) to generate a transferable framework for implementing multicentre RCTs in complex clinical settings. Methods A structured virtual World Café was conducted with CLARITY site coordinators, principal and associate investigators, and regional leads to explore experiences of trial delivery (n = 11). Breakout discussions were recorded and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was guided deductively by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and supplemented by inductive analysis to capture emergent, site-specific strategies. Results Discussions generated a framework emphasising embedding socially-mediated, low cognitive-load strategies into clinical routines. Role-specific tailoring strategies, distributed leadership, and informal communication channels sustained engagement, while ‘local champions’ anchored delivery. Interdepartmental collaboration was strengthened by staffing continuity, confidence in intervention value, and flexibility to context. Recruitment and data processes benefitted from diverse team structures, workflow alignment, and accessible support mechanisms. Conclusions This co-produced framework demonstrates that successful multicentre RCTs require deliberate and context-sensitive engagement strategies. These insights provide transferable guidance for enhancing fidelity, scalability, and engagement across diverse trial settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.263
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS289 - Optimising engagement and implementation in cluster randomised controlled trials: insights from CLARITY

Jinxiu Kang, Fatima Mansour, Moritz Steinruecke, Dion Morton et al.
British journal of surgery
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

SRS289 - Optimising engagement and implementation in cluster randomised controlled trials: insights from CLARITY

Jinxiu Kang, Fatima Mansour, Moritz Steinruecke, Dion Morton, Mohammad Alabdulrahman, Tak Ying Louise Ko, Derick Odigie, Amanda Godoi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating clinical interventions. However, in practice, many RCTs face challenges achieving consistent delivery across sites, risking under-recruitment, protocol deviations, and reduced validity. Strategies to support effective implementation are therefore essential for optimising intervention uptake and producing reliable evidence in busy healthcare environments. As a pragmatic cluster RCT involving emergency surgical teams as participants, CLARITY presents an opportunity to assess these strategies. Aim We aimed to identify and characterise practical strategies for improving site engagement with CLARITY (ISRCTN: 16757238) to generate a transferable framework for implementing multicentre RCTs in complex clinical settings. Methods A structured virtual World Café was conducted with CLARITY site coordinators, principal and associate investigators, and regional leads to explore experiences of trial delivery (n = 11). Breakout discussions were recorded and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was guided deductively by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and supplemented by inductive analysis to capture emergent, site-specific strategies. Results Discussions generated a framework emphasising embedding socially-mediated, low cognitive-load strategies into clinical routines. Role-specific tailoring strategies, distributed leadership, and informal communication channels sustained engagement, while ‘local champions’ anchored delivery. Interdepartmental collaboration was strengthened by staffing continuity, confidence in intervention value, and flexibility to context. Recruitment and data processes benefitted from diverse team structures, workflow alignment, and accessible support mechanisms. Conclusions This co-produced framework demonstrates that successful multicentre RCTs require deliberate and context-sensitive engagement strategies. These insights provide transferable guidance for enhancing fidelity, scalability, and engagement across diverse trial settings.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
University College Dublin (IE), National University of Ireland (IE), University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Medicine and Health Sciences (KN), University College Cork (IE), Cambridge School (PT), University College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.