Cost-effectiveness of frontline eltrombopag with immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia
• Frontline eltrombopag plus immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is cost-effective compared with IST alone for adults with severe aplastic anemia • Incremental net monetary benefit per patient treated with frontline eltrombopag is, on average, $64,000 The randomized phase 3 RACE trial demonstrated eltrombopag used in conjunction with traditional immunosuppressive therapy (IST) to be an efficacious treatment for severe aplastic anemia. However, eltrombopag can pose a significant cost burden. Using clinical data from the RACE trial, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis of frontline eltrombopag plus IST in adults with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia across all accepted willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds from the United States modified societal perspective. The primary outcome was the incremental net monetary benefit across WTP thresholds of $50,000-$150,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with base-case WTP threshold of $120,000/QALY. Frontline eltrombopag plus IST versus frontline IST alone accrued discounted costs of $593,000 and $561,000, and discounted QALYs of 11.53 and 10.73, respectively, with a per-patient incremental net monetary benefit of $64,000 [95% credible interval -$91,000 to $262,000] favoring frontline eltrombopag plus IST. Deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the 6-month overall response risk ratio (with versus without frontline eltrombopag) had the greatest effect on model results. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, frontline eltrombopag with IST was favored in 78% of 10,000 second-order Monte Carlo iterations, as well as 58% and 82% of 10,000 iterations at WTPs of $50,000 and $150,000/QALY, respectively. At current pricing, frontline eltrombopag is the cost-effective therapeutic strategy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in the US. Longer-term clinical and patient utility data will likely help further clarify the cost-effectiveness of eltrombopag in this setting.
Authors
- George Goshua (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-4427)
- Maximilian Stahl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-5901)
- Nikolai Alexandrovich Podoltsev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-778X)
- Kunal C. Potnis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8092-8295)
- Scott F. Huntington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-6475)
- Tariq Zuheir Kewan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4651-5125)
- Kishan Patel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6163-3069)
- Jessica M. Stempel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-0579)
- MANRAJ SRA
- Ding Quan Ng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-7901)
- Lourdes Mendez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5922-2877)
- Jan Philipp Bewersdorf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-0902)
- Rory Michael Shallis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8542-2944)
- Satoko Ito
- Amer M. Zeidan
Institutions
- Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Yale Cancer Center (US)
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Blood Red Cells & Iron
- Published
- 2026-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brci.2026.100076
- Primary Topic
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00