Cost-effectiveness of frontline eltrombopag with immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia

• Frontline eltrombopag plus immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is cost-effective compared with IST alone for adults with severe aplastic anemia • Incremental net monetary benefit per patient treated with frontline eltrombopag is, on average, $64,000 The randomized phase 3 RACE trial demonstrated eltrombopag used in conjunction with traditional immunosuppressive therapy (IST) to be an efficacious treatment for severe aplastic anemia. However, eltrombopag can pose a significant cost burden. Using clinical data from the RACE trial, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis of frontline eltrombopag plus IST in adults with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia across all accepted willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds from the United States modified societal perspective. The primary outcome was the incremental net monetary benefit across WTP thresholds of $50,000-$150,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with base-case WTP threshold of $120,000/QALY. Frontline eltrombopag plus IST versus frontline IST alone accrued discounted costs of $593,000 and $561,000, and discounted QALYs of 11.53 and 10.73, respectively, with a per-patient incremental net monetary benefit of $64,000 [95% credible interval -$91,000 to $262,000] favoring frontline eltrombopag plus IST. Deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the 6-month overall response risk ratio (with versus without frontline eltrombopag) had the greatest effect on model results. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, frontline eltrombopag with IST was favored in 78% of 10,000 second-order Monte Carlo iterations, as well as 58% and 82% of 10,000 iterations at WTPs of $50,000 and $150,000/QALY, respectively. At current pricing, frontline eltrombopag is the cost-effective therapeutic strategy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in the US. Longer-term clinical and patient utility data will likely help further clarify the cost-effectiveness of eltrombopag in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Red Cells & Iron
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brci.2026.100076
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of frontline eltrombopag with immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia

George Goshua, Maximilian Stahl, Nikolai Alexandrovich Podoltsev, Kunal C. Potnis et al.
Blood Red Cells & Iron
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Cost-effectiveness of frontline eltrombopag with immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia

George Goshua, Maximilian Stahl, Nikolai Alexandrovich Podoltsev, Kunal C. Potnis, Scott F. Huntington, Tariq Zuheir Kewan, Kishan Patel, Jessica M. Stempel, MANRAJ SRA, Ding Quan Ng, Lourdes Mendez, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Rory Michael Shallis, Satoko Ito, Amer M. Zeidan
article en

Abstract

• Frontline eltrombopag plus immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is cost-effective compared with IST alone for adults with severe aplastic anemia • Incremental net monetary benefit per patient treated with frontline eltrombopag is, on average, $64,000 The randomized phase 3 RACE trial demonstrated eltrombopag used in conjunction with traditional immunosuppressive therapy (IST) to be an efficacious treatment for severe aplastic anemia. However, eltrombopag can pose a significant cost burden. Using clinical data from the RACE trial, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis of frontline eltrombopag plus IST in adults with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia across all accepted willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds from the United States modified societal perspective. The primary outcome was the incremental net monetary benefit across WTP thresholds of $50,000-$150,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with base-case WTP threshold of $120,000/QALY. Frontline eltrombopag plus IST versus frontline IST alone accrued discounted costs of $593,000 and $561,000, and discounted QALYs of 11.53 and 10.73, respectively, with a per-patient incremental net monetary benefit of $64,000 [95% credible interval -$91,000 to $262,000] favoring frontline eltrombopag plus IST. Deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the 6-month overall response risk ratio (with versus without frontline eltrombopag) had the greatest effect on model results. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, frontline eltrombopag with IST was favored in 78% of 10,000 second-order Monte Carlo iterations, as well as 58% and 82% of 10,000 iterations at WTPs of $50,000 and $150,000/QALY, respectively. At current pricing, frontline eltrombopag is the cost-effective therapeutic strategy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in the US. Longer-term clinical and patient utility data will likely help further clarify the cost-effectiveness of eltrombopag in this setting.

Blood Red Cells & Iron
Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Yale University (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.