Scaffolding for Challenge-Based Learning in Sustainability Education: A Multiple-Case Study

Challenge-based learning (CBL) is a student-centered approach engaging learners in complex, open-ended problems. While such openness can foster deeper learning and creativity, it also demands high self-direction. Teachers must therefore provide sufficient scaffolding without undermining CBL’s authenticity. This study examines how secondary education teachers design and enact scaffolding in sustainability-oriented CBL projects, and how students experience this support. A multiple-case study of three projects distinguished soft scaffolding (adaptive, just-in-time support) from hard scaffolding (predefined tools and structures). Data included teacher interviews (n = 3), student focus groups (n = 18), and classroom observations. Findings showed the scaffolding type and function depended on project open-endedness, teacher readiness, and alignment with project focus. In the most open-ended project, the teacher mainly used soft scaffolding to guide thinking and decision-making, whereas more structured projects relied on hard scaffolds for procedural support. Students’ experiences varied: some thrived under autonomy, developing ownership and engagement, while others needed more explicit guidance. These results suggest that scaffolds should align with project goals, be explicit in their contribution to progress, match students’ readiness for self-directed learning, be enacted by teachers comfortable in a coaching role, and include affective support to help students manage frustration and uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073273
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding for Challenge-Based Learning in Sustainability Education: A Multiple-Case Study

Jan van der Veen, Johanna Vennix, Bart G. Schutte, Duru Nehir Bayram
Sustainability
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Scaffolding for Challenge-Based Learning in Sustainability Education: A Multiple-Case Study

Jan van der Veen, Johanna Vennix, Bart G. Schutte, Duru Nehir Bayram
article en

Abstract

Challenge-based learning (CBL) is a student-centered approach engaging learners in complex, open-ended problems. While such openness can foster deeper learning and creativity, it also demands high self-direction. Teachers must therefore provide sufficient scaffolding without undermining CBL’s authenticity. This study examines how secondary education teachers design and enact scaffolding in sustainability-oriented CBL projects, and how students experience this support. A multiple-case study of three projects distinguished soft scaffolding (adaptive, just-in-time support) from hard scaffolding (predefined tools and structures). Data included teacher interviews (n = 3), student focus groups (n = 18), and classroom observations. Findings showed the scaffolding type and function depended on project open-endedness, teacher readiness, and alignment with project focus. In the most open-ended project, the teacher mainly used soft scaffolding to guide thinking and decision-making, whereas more structured projects relied on hard scaffolds for procedural support. Students’ experiences varied: some thrived under autonomy, developing ownership and engagement, while others needed more explicit guidance. These results suggest that scaffolds should align with project goals, be explicit in their contribution to progress, match students’ readiness for self-directed learning, be enacted by teachers comfortable in a coaching role, and include affective support to help students manage frustration and uncertainty.

SustainabilityVol. 18(7)
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.