Sugar beet response to varied plant populations—Current and historic trial results

Abstract Since the end of the 1980s, plant populations (PP) of 80,000–100,000 plants ha −1 have been considered optimal for sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) cultivation without singling in temperate climate. Since then, however, yield levels and growing conditions have changed. To determine the current PP optimum, three field trials with PP from 55,000 to 130,000 plants ha −1 were carried out in Germany in 2022 and 2023, measuring canopy ground cover (CGC) via RGB images as well as sugar yield and taproot quality. Additionally, a meta‐analysis was carried out including literature data from the past 60 years (18 studies, 111 trials) to record possible changes in the optimum PP over the past decades. In the field trials, the sugar yield increased by 8% when the PP was increased from 55,000 to 100,000 plants ha −1 , while the CGC of 85%, indicating complete light interception, was advanced by 160°C day thermal time (base 3°C). In response to the PP variation, thermal time to reach 85% CGC highly correlated with sugar yield. Individual plants had no physiological source limitation, as they could more efficiently build up sugar yield with a higher taproot‐to‐leaf ratio, partially compensating for the yield loss due to the reduced plant number at lower PPs. PPs above 100,000 plant ha −1 produced only little additional yield. The meta‐analysis revealed no change in the optimal PP over the past decades. Thus, the PP of 80,000–100,000 plants ha −1 is still valid for current sugar beet cultivation with sowing to a stand in temperate climate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70350
Primary Topic
Light effects on plants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sugar beet response to varied plant populations—Current and historic trial results

Dennis Grunwald, Christa M. Hoffmann, Heinz‐Josef Koch
Agronomy Journal
Light effects on plants
article

Sugar beet response to varied plant populations—Current and historic trial results

Dennis Grunwald, Christa M. Hoffmann, Heinz‐Josef Koch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Since the end of the 1980s, plant populations (PP) of 80,000–100,000 plants ha −1 have been considered optimal for sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) cultivation without singling in temperate climate. Since then, however, yield levels and growing conditions have changed. To determine the current PP optimum, three field trials with PP from 55,000 to 130,000 plants ha −1 were carried out in Germany in 2022 and 2023, measuring canopy ground cover (CGC) via RGB images as well as sugar yield and taproot quality. Additionally, a meta‐analysis was carried out including literature data from the past 60 years (18 studies, 111 trials) to record possible changes in the optimum PP over the past decades. In the field trials, the sugar yield increased by 8% when the PP was increased from 55,000 to 100,000 plants ha −1 , while the CGC of 85%, indicating complete light interception, was advanced by 160°C day thermal time (base 3°C). In response to the PP variation, thermal time to reach 85% CGC highly correlated with sugar yield. Individual plants had no physiological source limitation, as they could more efficiently build up sugar yield with a higher taproot‐to‐leaf ratio, partially compensating for the yield loss due to the reduced plant number at lower PPs. PPs above 100,000 plant ha −1 produced only little additional yield. The meta‐analysis revealed no change in the optimal PP over the past decades. Thus, the PP of 80,000–100,000 plants ha −1 is still valid for current sugar beet cultivation with sowing to a stand in temperate climate.

Agronomy JournalVol. 118(2)
Institute of Sugar Beet (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Light effects on plants
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.