Beyond Adaptation: Institutional Anchoring for Multinationals in Conflict Zones

Operating in conflict zones forces multinational enterprises to decide how far to engage when institutional voids and fragmented authority undermine routine governance. This article introduces Institutional Anchoring and develops the ANCR Compass, a practical diagnostic linking corridor-level diagnosis to four governance roles: Adapter, Negotiator, Co-creator, and Reconfigurer. Two anchoring rules guide role choice: headquarters involvement should increase with deeper institutional voids, while credible local political authorization should increase with greater authority fragmentation. For managers and policymakers, the framework provides a disciplined approach to selecting roles, managing escalation, communicating reversals, and maintaining legitimate action and sustained operational continuity under fragmented authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIB Insights
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.159489
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Adaptation: Institutional Anchoring for Multinationals in Conflict Zones

Xinwei Shi, Wenwei Chen, Yirun Lu
AIB Insights
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Beyond Adaptation: Institutional Anchoring for Multinationals in Conflict Zones

Xinwei Shi, Wenwei Chen, Yirun Lu
article en

Abstract

Operating in conflict zones forces multinational enterprises to decide how far to engage when institutional voids and fragmented authority undermine routine governance. This article introduces Institutional Anchoring and develops the ANCR Compass, a practical diagnostic linking corridor-level diagnosis to four governance roles: Adapter, Negotiator, Co-creator, and Reconfigurer. Two anchoring rules guide role choice: headquarters involvement should increase with deeper institutional voids, while credible local political authorization should increase with greater authority fragmentation. For managers and policymakers, the framework provides a disciplined approach to selecting roles, managing escalation, communicating reversals, and maintaining legitimate action and sustained operational continuity under fragmented authority.

AIB Insights
Durham University (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Tsinghua University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.