Criminalizing ‘female genital mutilation’: Where is the harm?

Abstract The ‘global prohibition regime’ against ‘female genital mutilation’ (FGM) remains understudied within criminology. Zemiology, with its raison d’être to locate the source and nature of harm, opens up analytical potential. Bringing zemiology together with decolonial feminist approaches for the first time, we analyse data from focus group interviews with people of Somali heritage living in Bristol, England, to consider the unacknowledged harms created by anti-FGM legal and policy developments in the UK context. We argue that the racialized criminalization of ‘FGM’ gives rise to considerable harm: in particular, harms of misrecognition, autonomy and psychological well-being. We conclude by considering the wider relevance of our findings to debates on state responses to violence against women and girls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azag017
Primary Topic
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminalizing ‘female genital mutilation’: Where is the harm?

Magda Mogilnicka, Saffron Karlsen, Christina Pantazis, Natasha Carver
The British Journal of Criminology
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
article

Criminalizing ‘female genital mutilation’: Where is the harm?

Magda Mogilnicka, Saffron Karlsen, Christina Pantazis, Natasha Carver
article en

Abstract

Abstract The ‘global prohibition regime’ against ‘female genital mutilation’ (FGM) remains understudied within criminology. Zemiology, with its raison d’être to locate the source and nature of harm, opens up analytical potential. Bringing zemiology together with decolonial feminist approaches for the first time, we analyse data from focus group interviews with people of Somali heritage living in Bristol, England, to consider the unacknowledged harms created by anti-FGM legal and policy developments in the UK context. We argue that the racialized criminalization of ‘FGM’ gives rise to considerable harm: in particular, harms of misrecognition, autonomy and psychological well-being. We conclude by considering the wider relevance of our findings to debates on state responses to violence against women and girls.

The British Journal of Criminology
University of Bristol (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.