Between Family and Market: China’s Emerging Third Way Model of Childcare and Its Challenges

This article investigates the recent development of formal childcare services in China, focusing on the policy framework introduced since 2019 and its implementation in three county-level regions. Drawing on Mahon’s typology of childcare welfare models, it identifies China’s approach as a tailored third way model, characterised by reliance on private investment, limited public funding, and the assignment of primary caregiving responsibilities to families. Based on policy analysis and qualitative fieldwork, the study reveals significant gaps between policy goals and service accessibility. While formal childcare is framed as a solution to declining fertility and work-life imbalance, high service costs and inadequate local support have constrained equitable access. The Chinese case suggests that without stronger public investment and gender-equality measures, the third way model is unlikely to sustain women’s employment and may deepen social inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Society
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746426101444
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Family and Market: China’s Emerging Third Way Model of Childcare and Its Challenges

Weiyue Yang, Quanbao Jiang
Social Policy and Society
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Between Family and Market: China’s Emerging Third Way Model of Childcare and Its Challenges

Weiyue Yang, Quanbao Jiang
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the recent development of formal childcare services in China, focusing on the policy framework introduced since 2019 and its implementation in three county-level regions. Drawing on Mahon’s typology of childcare welfare models, it identifies China’s approach as a tailored third way model, characterised by reliance on private investment, limited public funding, and the assignment of primary caregiving responsibilities to families. Based on policy analysis and qualitative fieldwork, the study reveals significant gaps between policy goals and service accessibility. While formal childcare is framed as a solution to declining fertility and work-life imbalance, high service costs and inadequate local support have constrained equitable access. The Chinese case suggests that without stronger public investment and gender-equality measures, the third way model is unlikely to sustain women’s employment and may deepen social inequalities.

Social Policy and Society
Guangzhou University (CN), Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Family and Market: China’s Emerging Third Way Model of Childcare and Its Challenges — Weiyue Yang, Quanbao Jiang · Social Policy and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS