Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM): Can Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation (PNE) Really Compete with Stage 1 to Predict Outcomes?

To summarize up to date literature comparing percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) to the Staged lead approach in identifying optimal candidates for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) or neurogenic bladder (NGB). Additionally, to understand pros and cons of each procedure including patient specific factors, patient experience, and cost to the healthcare system. In general, a staged approach has better predictability for those who may benefit from SNM for urinary symptoms. However, the reliability of PNE has increased with advancements to the monopolar lead. Stage 1 tined lead test is superior at predicting patients who may benefit from SNM, but PNE has undergone recent advancements improving its efficacy and should be considered a viable option for testing in select patients. Head to head studies are necessary to compare symptom outcomes, patient experience and cost effectiveness of each approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-026-00806-z
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM): Can Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation (PNE) Really Compete with Stage 1 to Predict Outcomes?

Rachna Sridhar, Priyanka Gupta, Hannah Glick
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM): Can Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation (PNE) Really Compete with Stage 1 to Predict Outcomes?

Rachna Sridhar, Priyanka Gupta, Hannah Glick
article en

Abstract

To summarize up to date literature comparing percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) to the Staged lead approach in identifying optimal candidates for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) or neurogenic bladder (NGB). Additionally, to understand pros and cons of each procedure including patient specific factors, patient experience, and cost to the healthcare system. In general, a staged approach has better predictability for those who may benefit from SNM for urinary symptoms. However, the reliability of PNE has increased with advancements to the monopolar lead. Stage 1 tined lead test is superior at predicting patients who may benefit from SNM, but PNE has undergone recent advancements improving its efficacy and should be considered a viable option for testing in select patients. Head to head studies are necessary to compare symptom outcomes, patient experience and cost effectiveness of each approach.

Current Bladder Dysfunction ReportsVol. 21(1)
University of Michigan (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.