Comparison analysis of combustion performance and mechanism of Al/PVDF and Al/PTFE

• The effects of PVDF and PTFE on combustion mechanism of Al powder were compared. • Al/PVDF has shorter ignition delay than Al/PTFE at the same fluoropolymer content. • Al/PVDF system exhibits greater combustion heat than Al/PTFE at the same Al content. • The Al-F reaction is influenced by the specific surface area of the Al particle. • The penetrating H atoms enable internal Al atoms to break through the oxide layer. Although both aluminum/polyvinylidene fluoride (Al/PVDF) and aluminum/polytetrafluoroethylene (Al/PTFE) systems exhibit excellent combustion performance, the study on comparing their combustion behaviors and the underlying mechanisms responsible for their differences are still relatively limited. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages of the Al/PVDF and Al/PTFE systems were compared through ignition experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. The Al/PTFE system exhibits higher combustion intensity, and the characteristic is attributed to the higher fluorine (F) content in PTFE, which triggers more Al-F reactions. In contrast, the Al/PVDF system exhibits a lower ignition delay time and higher combustion heat, which is attributed to the relatively lower initial decomposition temperature, the higher hydrogen (H) content, and the higher combustion heat in PVDF. Compared to oxygen (O) atoms, H atoms can penetrate the oxide film on the surface of Al particles more rapidly and react with the inner Al atoms, thereby reducing the temperature required for Al atoms to break through the oxide film and participate in reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.139230
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison analysis of combustion performance and mechanism of Al/PVDF and Al/PTFE

X. M. Fei, Minggao Xu, Yunlan Sun, Jiang Liu et al.
Fuel
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

Comparison analysis of combustion performance and mechanism of Al/PVDF and Al/PTFE

X. M. Fei, Minggao Xu, Yunlan Sun, Jiang Liu, Baozhong Zhu
article en

Abstract

• The effects of PVDF and PTFE on combustion mechanism of Al powder were compared. • Al/PVDF has shorter ignition delay than Al/PTFE at the same fluoropolymer content. • Al/PVDF system exhibits greater combustion heat than Al/PTFE at the same Al content. • The Al-F reaction is influenced by the specific surface area of the Al particle. • The penetrating H atoms enable internal Al atoms to break through the oxide layer. Although both aluminum/polyvinylidene fluoride (Al/PVDF) and aluminum/polytetrafluoroethylene (Al/PTFE) systems exhibit excellent combustion performance, the study on comparing their combustion behaviors and the underlying mechanisms responsible for their differences are still relatively limited. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages of the Al/PVDF and Al/PTFE systems were compared through ignition experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. The Al/PTFE system exhibits higher combustion intensity, and the characteristic is attributed to the higher fluorine (F) content in PTFE, which triggers more Al-F reactions. In contrast, the Al/PVDF system exhibits a lower ignition delay time and higher combustion heat, which is attributed to the relatively lower initial decomposition temperature, the higher hydrogen (H) content, and the higher combustion heat in PVDF. Compared to oxygen (O) atoms, H atoms can penetrate the oxide film on the surface of Al particles more rapidly and react with the inner Al atoms, thereby reducing the temperature required for Al atoms to break through the oxide film and participate in reactions.

FuelVol. 423
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Changzhou University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.