ACCURACY AND GENERALIZABILITY OF AN OPEN-SOURCE DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR FACIAL BONE SEGMENTATION ON CT AND CBCT SCANS: AN EX VIVO STUDY

• Ex vivo ground-truth validation of open-source AI facial bone segmentation • Clinically meaningful surface distance metrics used for AI evaluation • High trueness (<0.1 mm) across segmented CT and CBCT surfaces • Fully automated workflow showed perfect reproducibility • Robust performance maintained under ultra-low-dose CBCT protocols To evaluate the accuracy and generalizability of DentalSegmentator, an open-source deep learning tool, for automated reconstruction of facial skeletal surface models from computed tomography (CT) scans acquired under different ex vivo imaging conditions. Ten human dry skulls were scanned using one CT scanner and three cone beam CT (CBCT) protocols, including an ultra-low-dose protocol, on two CBCT devices. High-accuracy reference surface models were acquired using an optical scanner. CT and CBCT scans were automatically segmented using the open-source DentalSegmentator model and reconstructed as 3D surface models. Three facial regions (forehead, zygomatic process, and maxillary process) were defined for quantitative assessment. Accuracy was measured as the mean absolute distance (MAD) and the standard deviation of absolute distances (SDAD) between segmented and reference models after best-fit superimposition. Repeated segmentations were identical, confirming perfect reproducibility. Across all acquisition settings and regions, DentalSegmentator produced highly accurate skeletal surface models, with an overall median MAD of 0.088 mm (IQR 0.073) and SDAD of 0.061 mm (IQR 0.028). Small but significant differences were detected between imaging systems (MAD: p < 0.001; SDAD: p = 0.003), with CT scans showing slightly lower trueness than CBCT images. DentalSegmentator produced accurate facial skeletal surface models across diverse CT and CBCT settings, demonstrating excellent generalizability, including under low-radiation conditions. Minor differences in trueness between imaging systems were small and unlikely to affect clinical or research applications. Deep learning provides a robust foundation for automated 3D craniofacial surface extraction, supporting broader adoption of AI-driven workflows in clinical and research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dentistry
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106663
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ACCURACY AND GENERALIZABILITY OF AN OPEN-SOURCE DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR FACIAL BONE SEGMENTATION ON CT AND CBCT SCANS: AN EX VIVO STUDY

Nikolaos Gkantidis, Gauthier Dot, Mohammed Ghamri
Journal of Dentistry
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

ACCURACY AND GENERALIZABILITY OF AN OPEN-SOURCE DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR FACIAL BONE SEGMENTATION ON CT AND CBCT SCANS: AN EX VIVO STUDY

Nikolaos Gkantidis, Gauthier Dot, Mohammed Ghamri
article en

Abstract

• Ex vivo ground-truth validation of open-source AI facial bone segmentation • Clinically meaningful surface distance metrics used for AI evaluation • High trueness (<0.1 mm) across segmented CT and CBCT surfaces • Fully automated workflow showed perfect reproducibility • Robust performance maintained under ultra-low-dose CBCT protocols To evaluate the accuracy and generalizability of DentalSegmentator, an open-source deep learning tool, for automated reconstruction of facial skeletal surface models from computed tomography (CT) scans acquired under different ex vivo imaging conditions. Ten human dry skulls were scanned using one CT scanner and three cone beam CT (CBCT) protocols, including an ultra-low-dose protocol, on two CBCT devices. High-accuracy reference surface models were acquired using an optical scanner. CT and CBCT scans were automatically segmented using the open-source DentalSegmentator model and reconstructed as 3D surface models. Three facial regions (forehead, zygomatic process, and maxillary process) were defined for quantitative assessment. Accuracy was measured as the mean absolute distance (MAD) and the standard deviation of absolute distances (SDAD) between segmented and reference models after best-fit superimposition. Repeated segmentations were identical, confirming perfect reproducibility. Across all acquisition settings and regions, DentalSegmentator produced highly accurate skeletal surface models, with an overall median MAD of 0.088 mm (IQR 0.073) and SDAD of 0.061 mm (IQR 0.028). Small but significant differences were detected between imaging systems (MAD: p < 0.001; SDAD: p = 0.003), with CT scans showing slightly lower trueness than CBCT images. DentalSegmentator produced accurate facial skeletal surface models across diverse CT and CBCT settings, demonstrating excellent generalizability, including under low-radiation conditions. Minor differences in trueness between imaging systems were small and unlikely to affect clinical or research applications. Deep learning provides a robust foundation for automated 3D craniofacial surface extraction, supporting broader adoption of AI-driven workflows in clinical and research settings.

Journal of Dentistry
University of Bern (CH), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), University of Jeddah (SA), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.