A reproducible workflow for isolating and characterizing bacterial endophytes, pathogens, and saprophytic colonizers from tomato fruits

A reproducible workflow is presented that integrates fruit‑health stratification, stringent surface sterilization, culture‑based isolation, molecular identification, enzyme phenotyping, and a low‑injury needle‑transfer pathogenicity assay to isolate, classify and functionally characterize bacterial endophytes, saprophytic colonizers and pathogens associated with postharvest tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) fruits. The method is designed to distinguish ecological guilds (endophytes vs soft‑rot pathogens vs saprophytes) rather than simply list “bacteria present”, and can be implemented in standard microbiology laboratories without specialized equipment. Tomato fruits were stratified by fruit-health status and surface‑sterilized to distinguish internal endophytes from epiphytic and saprophytic surface‑associated communities. All bacterial isolates were cultured on tryptone soya agar, purified, assigned to an ecological niche (healthy or spoiled/diseased fruits), and tested for in planta pathogenicity on tomato fruits. All the isolates were identified using biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, while preliminary phenotypic screening was used to quantify cell wall‑degrading activities relevant to soft‑rot. The workflow yielded 14 characterized bacterial isolates spanning three ecological groups (non‑pathogenic endophytic Bacillus species, soft‑rot‑inducing Enterobacterales, and saprophytic colonizers), with ecological niche separation statistically supported by Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.001). The method can be adapted to other fruit or vegetable systems to link bacterial community composition with plant health outcomes. • Provides a low-injury and contamination-reduced approach for fruit pathogenicity assays based on a needle‑transfer inoculation technique adapted for routine microbiology laboratories. • Enables the functional differentiation of endophytic, saprophytic, and pathogenic bacterial isolates relevant to fruits and vegetables through combined ecological sources, in planta pathogenicity, and enzyme phenotyping. • The approach is adaptable to multiple fruit and vegetable host crops in a resource-limited and efficient laboratory setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103889
Primary Topic
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A reproducible workflow for isolating and characterizing bacterial endophytes, pathogens, and saprophytic colonizers from tomato fruits

Abraham Goodness Ogofure, Etinosa Ogbomoede Igbinosa, Ezekiel Green
MethodsX
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
article

A reproducible workflow for isolating and characterizing bacterial endophytes, pathogens, and saprophytic colonizers from tomato fruits

Abraham Goodness Ogofure, Etinosa Ogbomoede Igbinosa, Ezekiel Green
article en

Abstract

A reproducible workflow is presented that integrates fruit‑health stratification, stringent surface sterilization, culture‑based isolation, molecular identification, enzyme phenotyping, and a low‑injury needle‑transfer pathogenicity assay to isolate, classify and functionally characterize bacterial endophytes, saprophytic colonizers and pathogens associated with postharvest tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) fruits. The method is designed to distinguish ecological guilds (endophytes vs soft‑rot pathogens vs saprophytes) rather than simply list “bacteria present”, and can be implemented in standard microbiology laboratories without specialized equipment. Tomato fruits were stratified by fruit-health status and surface‑sterilized to distinguish internal endophytes from epiphytic and saprophytic surface‑associated communities. All bacterial isolates were cultured on tryptone soya agar, purified, assigned to an ecological niche (healthy or spoiled/diseased fruits), and tested for in planta pathogenicity on tomato fruits. All the isolates were identified using biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, while preliminary phenotypic screening was used to quantify cell wall‑degrading activities relevant to soft‑rot. The workflow yielded 14 characterized bacterial isolates spanning three ecological groups (non‑pathogenic endophytic Bacillus species, soft‑rot‑inducing Enterobacterales, and saprophytic colonizers), with ecological niche separation statistically supported by Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.001). The method can be adapted to other fruit or vegetable systems to link bacterial community composition with plant health outcomes. • Provides a low-injury and contamination-reduced approach for fruit pathogenicity assays based on a needle‑transfer inoculation technique adapted for routine microbiology laboratories. • Enables the functional differentiation of endophytic, saprophytic, and pathogenic bacterial isolates relevant to fruits and vegetables through combined ecological sources, in planta pathogenicity, and enzyme phenotyping. • The approach is adaptable to multiple fruit and vegetable host crops in a resource-limited and efficient laboratory setting.

MethodsX
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.