Development and evaluation of an automated phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging algorithm for pediatric and adult cerebral blood flow measurement

Accurate Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) measurements are essential for studying pediatric cerebral hemodynamics. Phase Contrast (PC) imaging is a fast, non-invasive, and non-radiating technique for measuring flows. PC image processing traditionally includes manually segmenting, identifying, and unaliasing vessels of interest, which are challenging in children and involve intra- and inter-observer variation. We acquired 3 T PC images from 59 children and 39 adults (mean and standard deviation 3.43 ± 2.60 and 57.28 ± 3.87 years). Our algorithm identified voxels that skew the PC image intensity, refined vessels with active contours (Chan-Vese), split adjacent vessels with watershedding, and used a heuristic to identify the correct arteries based on vessel characteristics. We developed an automated algorithm to process PC images, thereby ensuring high precision. Images were processed images manually (two analysts) and algorithmically to compare performance overall and for each component. Total CBF measurements were correlated between ground truth and algorithm versus between two analysts (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.748—0.817 vs 0.810—0.919). A two-way analysis of variance indicated no difference between human and algorithm for total CBF (p = 0.1558). The performance of algorithm versus two human analysts were similar across components: segmentation (Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient = 0.777—0.849 vs 0.830—0.890), unaliasing (Mean Absolute Error = 0.355—0.538 vs 0.410—0.555), and vessel identification in adults (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 1.000 vs 1.000). Analysts were similar versus algorithm at vessel identification in children (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 1.000 vs 0.983). Automated algorithm components performed similarly to gold standard manual analysis and ensured high precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroradiology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-026-03948-3
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and evaluation of an automated phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging algorithm for pediatric and adult cerebral blood flow measurement

Meredith N. Braskie, Benita Tamrazi, Bethany L. Sussman, Hussein N. Yassine et al.
Neuroradiology
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Development and evaluation of an automated phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging algorithm for pediatric and adult cerebral blood flow measurement

Meredith N. Braskie, Benita Tamrazi, Bethany L. Sussman, Hussein N. Yassine, Eamon K. Doyle, Peter A. Chiarelli, Jian Liu, Sudarshan Ranganathan, A. Karnwal, Samantha T. Nimmo, Isabel Torres, Matthew T. Borzage, Bradley J. De Souza, John C. Wood, Bradley S. Peterson
article en

Abstract

Accurate Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) measurements are essential for studying pediatric cerebral hemodynamics. Phase Contrast (PC) imaging is a fast, non-invasive, and non-radiating technique for measuring flows. PC image processing traditionally includes manually segmenting, identifying, and unaliasing vessels of interest, which are challenging in children and involve intra- and inter-observer variation. We acquired 3 T PC images from 59 children and 39 adults (mean and standard deviation 3.43 ± 2.60 and 57.28 ± 3.87 years). Our algorithm identified voxels that skew the PC image intensity, refined vessels with active contours (Chan-Vese), split adjacent vessels with watershedding, and used a heuristic to identify the correct arteries based on vessel characteristics. We developed an automated algorithm to process PC images, thereby ensuring high precision. Images were processed images manually (two analysts) and algorithmically to compare performance overall and for each component. Total CBF measurements were correlated between ground truth and algorithm versus between two analysts (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.748—0.817 vs 0.810—0.919). A two-way analysis of variance indicated no difference between human and algorithm for total CBF (p = 0.1558). The performance of algorithm versus two human analysts were similar across components: segmentation (Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient = 0.777—0.849 vs 0.830—0.890), unaliasing (Mean Absolute Error = 0.355—0.538 vs 0.410—0.555), and vessel identification in adults (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 1.000 vs 1.000). Analysts were similar versus algorithm at vessel identification in children (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 1.000 vs 0.983). Automated algorithm components performed similarly to gold standard manual analysis and ensured high precision.

Neuroradiology
University of Southern California (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.