Dedication to the dwelling and neighbourhood? Rural-urban differences in determinants of mid-to-later-life homeowners to age@home

• The highlights of the paper ‘Dedication to the dwelling and neighbourhood? Rural-urban differences in determinants of mid-to-later-life homeowners to age@home’ are: • Rural 55-plus homeowners are particularly attached to their home and neighbourhood • Urban senior homeowners find proximity to amenities decisive to stay independently • 75-plus rural homeowners are more likely to age@home compared to urban ones • Rural older homeowners embrace multi-generational living as option to age@home • Government policy to age@home could promote house adaptations and smart technologies A limited number of studies have addressed rural-urban differences in ageing in place, let alone at the spatial level of the dwelling, defined as ageing@home. Ageing@home in rural areas might be challenging, especially when health deteriorates and facilities and services may be less available or accessible in comparison to urban areas. This paper explores whether determinants like motives, socio-demographic characteristics, housing type and attitude towards multi-generational living differ between rural and urban mid-to-later-life homeowners who intend to age@home. Our analysis is based on a dataset (N=11,010) of the ’55-plus Housing Needs Survey’ by the Dutch Homeowners Association, consisting of mid-to-later-life homeowners who all intend to age@home. Using logistic regression, we compare determinants like types of attachment, financial and social motives for ageing@home of rural and urban homeowners. Neighbourhood attachment and house attachment show to be significant determinants of rural, mid-to-later-life homeowners who intend to age@home, while urban homeowners appreciate ‘proximity to amenities’ significantly more. Especially 75-plus rural homeowners are more likely to age@home compared to 75-plus urban ones. Also, for rural homeowners living with a partner increases the probability of intending to age@home. Furthermore, mid-to-later-life rural homeowners are significantly more likely to have a positive attitude towards multi-generational living as an option to continue to live independently. Based on our results of rural homeowners’ attachment to their dwelling and neighbourhood, government policies to age@home could focus on encouraging housing modifications and smart technologies. Whereas ‘downsizing’ and multi-generational living in age-friendly rural communities might enable flow in the local housing market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellbeing Space and Society
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2026.100393
Primary Topic
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dedication to the dwelling and neighbourhood? Rural-urban differences in determinants of mid-to-later-life homeowners to age@home

Elles A.M. Bulder, Tialda Haartsen, Hieke T. van der Kloet
Wellbeing Space and Society
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
article

Dedication to the dwelling and neighbourhood? Rural-urban differences in determinants of mid-to-later-life homeowners to age@home

Elles A.M. Bulder, Tialda Haartsen, Hieke T. van der Kloet
article en

Abstract

• The highlights of the paper ‘Dedication to the dwelling and neighbourhood? Rural-urban differences in determinants of mid-to-later-life homeowners to age@home’ are: • Rural 55-plus homeowners are particularly attached to their home and neighbourhood • Urban senior homeowners find proximity to amenities decisive to stay independently • 75-plus rural homeowners are more likely to age@home compared to urban ones • Rural older homeowners embrace multi-generational living as option to age@home • Government policy to age@home could promote house adaptations and smart technologies A limited number of studies have addressed rural-urban differences in ageing in place, let alone at the spatial level of the dwelling, defined as ageing@home. Ageing@home in rural areas might be challenging, especially when health deteriorates and facilities and services may be less available or accessible in comparison to urban areas. This paper explores whether determinants like motives, socio-demographic characteristics, housing type and attitude towards multi-generational living differ between rural and urban mid-to-later-life homeowners who intend to age@home. Our analysis is based on a dataset (N=11,010) of the ’55-plus Housing Needs Survey’ by the Dutch Homeowners Association, consisting of mid-to-later-life homeowners who all intend to age@home. Using logistic regression, we compare determinants like types of attachment, financial and social motives for ageing@home of rural and urban homeowners. Neighbourhood attachment and house attachment show to be significant determinants of rural, mid-to-later-life homeowners who intend to age@home, while urban homeowners appreciate ‘proximity to amenities’ significantly more. Especially 75-plus rural homeowners are more likely to age@home compared to 75-plus urban ones. Also, for rural homeowners living with a partner increases the probability of intending to age@home. Furthermore, mid-to-later-life rural homeowners are significantly more likely to have a positive attitude towards multi-generational living as an option to continue to live independently. Based on our results of rural homeowners’ attachment to their dwelling and neighbourhood, government policies to age@home could focus on encouraging housing modifications and smart technologies. Whereas ‘downsizing’ and multi-generational living in age-friendly rural communities might enable flow in the local housing market.

Wellbeing Space and Society
University of Groningen (NL), Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.