SRS195 - Systematic photo-documentation significantly improves lesion detection in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: results from the gastroprove randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Missed lesions account for up to 15% of post-OGD cancers. International societies advocate systematic photo-documentation, yet evidence remains low-quality and Irish KPIs require only two images (D2 and retroflexed fundus). Methods We conducted a randomised trial using the Simbionix GI Mentor™ simulator. Sixteen early surgical trainees (<50 OGDs in 15/16) were randomised to either: (i) control—Irish KPI protocol, or (ii) intervention—BSG 8-landmark photo-documentation. Each trainee completed 10 OGDs (5 normal, 5 pathology-positive). Outcomes were lesion detection, multi-lesion performance, procedure time, and adherence to photo-documentation. A baseline questionnaire assessed KPI knowledge and lesion-specific biopsy/reporting protocols. Results Across 80 pathology-positive cases, case-level detection was 80% in intervention versus 52% in control. In multi-lesion scenarios, ‘all-lesions-found’ (ALF) rates were 95% versus 25%, with control misses almost entirely due to non-imaged sites (incisura, antrum). Intervention trainees captured all landmarks in nearly every case; controls averaged 59% coverage. Recognition errors despite full coverage were rare (1 miss in 54 lesions). Procedure times were slightly longer in intervention (4:06 versus 3:26). Questionnaire data confirmed limited baseline knowledge: 31% correctly identified Irish KPIs, 12.5% knew the Prague system, 25% the Seattle protocol, and 6% the Sydney protocol. No control trainee reported prior awareness of the BSG 8-landmark standard, supporting absence of contamination. Conclusions Systematic 8-landmark photo-documentation substantially improves lesion detection, especially in multi-lesion cases, by eliminating coverage-driven misses. Recognition gaps remain a minority issue. These findings provide the first randomised evidence supporting photo-documentation as a quality metric in OGD training and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.183
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS195 - Systematic photo-documentation significantly improves lesion detection in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: results from the gastroprove randomised controlled trial

Eoghan Burke, D. O’Keeffe, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy et al.
British journal of surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

SRS195 - Systematic photo-documentation significantly improves lesion detection in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: results from the gastroprove randomised controlled trial

Eoghan Burke, D. O’Keeffe, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy, Colm Neary, Mark Behan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Missed lesions account for up to 15% of post-OGD cancers. International societies advocate systematic photo-documentation, yet evidence remains low-quality and Irish KPIs require only two images (D2 and retroflexed fundus). Methods We conducted a randomised trial using the Simbionix GI Mentor™ simulator. Sixteen early surgical trainees (<50 OGDs in 15/16) were randomised to either: (i) control—Irish KPI protocol, or (ii) intervention—BSG 8-landmark photo-documentation. Each trainee completed 10 OGDs (5 normal, 5 pathology-positive). Outcomes were lesion detection, multi-lesion performance, procedure time, and adherence to photo-documentation. A baseline questionnaire assessed KPI knowledge and lesion-specific biopsy/reporting protocols. Results Across 80 pathology-positive cases, case-level detection was 80% in intervention versus 52% in control. In multi-lesion scenarios, ‘all-lesions-found’ (ALF) rates were 95% versus 25%, with control misses almost entirely due to non-imaged sites (incisura, antrum). Intervention trainees captured all landmarks in nearly every case; controls averaged 59% coverage. Recognition errors despite full coverage were rare (1 miss in 54 lesions). Procedure times were slightly longer in intervention (4:06 versus 3:26). Questionnaire data confirmed limited baseline knowledge: 31% correctly identified Irish KPIs, 12.5% knew the Prague system, 25% the Seattle protocol, and 6% the Sydney protocol. No control trainee reported prior awareness of the BSG 8-landmark standard, supporting absence of contamination. Conclusions Systematic 8-landmark photo-documentation substantially improves lesion detection, especially in multi-lesion cases, by eliminating coverage-driven misses. Recognition gaps remain a minority issue. These findings provide the first randomised evidence supporting photo-documentation as a quality metric in OGD training and practice.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.