Development of a structured family reception procedure in adult intensive care

Introduction: Family reception in adult intensive care units is a critical yet inconsistently structured practice, despite recommendations for family-centered care. Objective: To develop a structured procedure for family reception in adult intensive care and achieve expert consensus on its content. Methods: A two-phase methodological study was conducted. Phase 1 comprised a focus group with nine experienced intensive care professionals to explore current reception practices and key procedural components. Phase 2 used a two-round e-Delphi technique with ten expert critical care nurses to evaluate item relevance and clarity. Predefined consensus criteria were applied. Results: Focus group analysis identified four thematic areas that informed the draft procedure. e-Delphi consensus was achieved for 42 items, organized into three components: a pre-visit reception moment, a post-visit communication moment, and provision of standardized written information. Conclusion: This study produced a structured, expert-agreed family reception procedure for adult intensive care. Further studies should examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and family perspectives in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revistas SARC
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0229.44825
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a structured family reception procedure in adult intensive care

Sonia Martins, José Henry Osório, José Alves, Ana Isabel Silva et al.
Revistas SARC
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Development of a structured family reception procedure in adult intensive care

Sonia Martins, José Henry Osório, José Alves, Ana Isabel Silva, Maria Aurora Pereira
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Family reception in adult intensive care units is a critical yet inconsistently structured practice, despite recommendations for family-centered care. Objective: To develop a structured procedure for family reception in adult intensive care and achieve expert consensus on its content. Methods: A two-phase methodological study was conducted. Phase 1 comprised a focus group with nine experienced intensive care professionals to explore current reception practices and key procedural components. Phase 2 used a two-round e-Delphi technique with ten expert critical care nurses to evaluate item relevance and clarity. Predefined consensus criteria were applied. Results: Focus group analysis identified four thematic areas that informed the draft procedure. e-Delphi consensus was achieved for 42 items, organized into three components: a pre-visit reception moment, a post-visit communication moment, and provision of standardized written information. Conclusion: This study produced a structured, expert-agreed family reception procedure for adult intensive care. Further studies should examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and family perspectives in clinical settings.

Revistas SARC
Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Unidade Local de Saúde de Entre Douro e Vouga (PT), Hospital Braga (PT), Unidade Hospitalar de Bragança (PT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of a structured family reception procedure in adult intensive care — Sonia Martins, José Henry Osório, et al. · Revistas SARC (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS