Human decision-making and governance challenges in AI-assisted invention: Insights from Romanian intellectual property experts

Objective This study examines how Romanian intellectual property experts perceive and manage the complexities of AI-assisted invention, with a focus on the challenges posed by human decision-making and governance. Methods This study employed a qualitative design, conducting semi-structured interviews with five Romanian experts from the academic, legal, and industrial sectors. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 12. Results Experts consistently viewed AI as a supportive tool that enhances data processing but lacks the intentionality and creativity required for inventorship. Key concerns included authorship ambiguity, risks of infringement, and the need for transparent human oversight. Participants emphasized the importance of adaptive regulatory frameworks and interdisciplinary education. Conclusion AI-assisted invention requires human-centered governance that ensures ethical accountability and legal clarity. The findings underscore the central role of human judgment and call for enhanced information literacy and institutional preparedness in managing AI-driven innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Systems Management
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01672533261437677
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human decision-making and governance challenges in AI-assisted invention: Insights from Romanian intellectual property experts

Laura Leluțiu, Angela Repanovici
Human Systems Management
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Human decision-making and governance challenges in AI-assisted invention: Insights from Romanian intellectual property experts

Laura Leluțiu, Angela Repanovici
article en

Abstract

Objective This study examines how Romanian intellectual property experts perceive and manage the complexities of AI-assisted invention, with a focus on the challenges posed by human decision-making and governance. Methods This study employed a qualitative design, conducting semi-structured interviews with five Romanian experts from the academic, legal, and industrial sectors. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 12. Results Experts consistently viewed AI as a supportive tool that enhances data processing but lacks the intentionality and creativity required for inventorship. Key concerns included authorship ambiguity, risks of infringement, and the need for transparent human oversight. Participants emphasized the importance of adaptive regulatory frameworks and interdisciplinary education. Conclusion AI-assisted invention requires human-centered governance that ensures ethical accountability and legal clarity. The findings underscore the central role of human judgment and call for enhanced information literacy and institutional preparedness in managing AI-driven innovation.

Human Systems Management
Transylvania University of Brașov (RO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human decision-making and governance challenges in AI-assisted invention: Insights from Romanian intellectual property experts — Laura Leluțiu, Angela Repanovici · Human Systems Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS