Principles for ethical boundary spanning between science, policy and practice: A guide for knowledge brokers

Knowledge brokers have emerged as a key mechanism for facilitating knowledge exchange across institutional and epistemic divides to enable more inclusive, informed, and context-sensitive decision-making. However, despite growing recognition about their value and importance, critical gaps remain related to how knowledge brokers operate that hinders their effectiveness and efficiency in practice. One such gap relates to the ethical dimensions of their work, which remain underexplored and lack formal conceptualization. This perspective addresses this gap by examining the overarching ethical challenges knowledge brokers face, and proposing a set of twelve experientially-derived principles to guide more ethically grounded knowledge brokering. For each principle we also outline a suite of practical behaviours, attitudes and actions to support their realisation in practice. In doing so, our goal is to help recognize and engage with the depth of ethical complexity that knowledge brokers must navigate, support those working in these often-invisible roles, and contribute to a broader conversation about how to strengthen the interface of sustainability science, policy and practice. We conclude by calling for greater institutional support, leadership, and a shift toward ‘ethics by design’ approaches that embed ethical reflection and practices in knowledge brokering efforts from the outset. • We examine the key ethical challenges faced by knowledge brokers in science–policy-practice contexts. • Twelve experientially-derived principles are provided to guide ethical knowledge brokering. • For each principle we outline practical behaviours, attitudes and actions to support their realisation in practice. • Greater institutional support, leadership, and a shift toward ‘ethics by design’ approaches are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104361
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principles for ethical boundary spanning between science, policy and practice: A guide for knowledge brokers

Nicole Lisa Klenk, Z. Hilly, Simon West, Mark Howden et al.
Environmental Science & Policy
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Principles for ethical boundary spanning between science, policy and practice: A guide for knowledge brokers

Nicole Lisa Klenk, Z. Hilly, Simon West, Mark Howden, Alison M. Meadow, James Downe, Carina Wyborn, Anna‐Katharina Hornidge, Stefan Partelow, Paul Cairney, Denis B. Karcher, Angela Bednarek, Christopher Cvitanovic, Jess Melbourne-Thomas, Rachel Kelly, Ramona Dalla Pozza, Eleanor MacKillop
article en

Abstract

Knowledge brokers have emerged as a key mechanism for facilitating knowledge exchange across institutional and epistemic divides to enable more inclusive, informed, and context-sensitive decision-making. However, despite growing recognition about their value and importance, critical gaps remain related to how knowledge brokers operate that hinders their effectiveness and efficiency in practice. One such gap relates to the ethical dimensions of their work, which remain underexplored and lack formal conceptualization. This perspective addresses this gap by examining the overarching ethical challenges knowledge brokers face, and proposing a set of twelve experientially-derived principles to guide more ethically grounded knowledge brokering. For each principle we also outline a suite of practical behaviours, attitudes and actions to support their realisation in practice. In doing so, our goal is to help recognize and engage with the depth of ethical complexity that knowledge brokers must navigate, support those working in these often-invisible roles, and contribute to a broader conversation about how to strengthen the interface of sustainability science, policy and practice. We conclude by calling for greater institutional support, leadership, and a shift toward ‘ethics by design’ approaches that embed ethical reflection and practices in knowledge brokering efforts from the outset. • We examine the key ethical challenges faced by knowledge brokers in science–policy-practice contexts. • Twelve experientially-derived principles are provided to guide ethical knowledge brokering. • For each principle we outline practical behaviours, attitudes and actions to support their realisation in practice. • Greater institutional support, leadership, and a shift toward ‘ethics by design’ approaches are needed.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 179
Australian National University (AU), University of Stirling (GB), CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), University of Bonn (DE), University of Arizona (US), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE), Stockholm University (SE), University of Toronto (CA), University of Canberra (AU), Independent Sector (US), Charles Darwin University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of the South Pacific - Solomon Islands Campus (SB), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), Life & Brain (Germany) (DE), ACT Government (AU), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.