“I Want to Be Interdependent”: An Exploratory Study on the Use of Supported Decision-Making for People with Serious Mental Illness

This exploratory study aimed to empower people with serious mental illness to create and implement supported decision-making plans and study the impact on their decision-making process. We found that study participants were able to: (1) use supported decision-making once empowered to do so; (2) decide when and how to use supported decision-making; and (3) develop individualized decision-making strategies based upon their unique characteristics and situations. The adoption of supported decision-making in clinical practice, research, and policy is essential to ensure the rights and well-being of adults with decisional incapacity. In particular, integrating supported decision-making into clinical research protocols can enhance informed consent processes and promote meaningful participation of individuals with serious mental illness, balancing respect for their autonomy with appropriate protections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10189
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Want to Be Interdependent”: An Exploratory Study on the Use of Supported Decision-Making for People with Serious Mental Illness

Fatma Wise, Fitore Hyseni, Jonathan Martinis, Elyn R. Saks et al.
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

“I Want to Be Interdependent”: An Exploratory Study on the Use of Supported Decision-Making for People with Serious Mental Illness

Fatma Wise, Fitore Hyseni, Jonathan Martinis, Elyn R. Saks, Peter Blanck, Nanette Goodman
article en

Abstract

This exploratory study aimed to empower people with serious mental illness to create and implement supported decision-making plans and study the impact on their decision-making process. We found that study participants were able to: (1) use supported decision-making once empowered to do so; (2) decide when and how to use supported decision-making; and (3) develop individualized decision-making strategies based upon their unique characteristics and situations. The adoption of supported decision-making in clinical practice, research, and policy is essential to ensure the rights and well-being of adults with decisional incapacity. In particular, integrating supported decision-making into clinical research protocols can enhance informed consent processes and promote meaningful participation of individuals with serious mental illness, balancing respect for their autonomy with appropriate protections.

The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (BR), University of Virginia (US), Syracuse University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.