Stages of farm profitability after soil health system adoption in Georgia cotton

Abstract Soil health management systems (SHMS) that include reduced tillage and cover cropping can improve productivity and reduce inputs in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) systems. However, there is limited understanding about the economic impacts during the transition period from conventional systems to SHMS. We conducted interviews with eight cotton growers in Georgia and grouped related production changes into stages. Ordering the resulting stages of production change in a logical sequence of occurrence allowed us to assess the change in net farm income through the transition of adoption. Initial cost of adoption included reduced tillage, followed by cover cropping, and resulted in decreased net farm income by $3 and $74 ha −1 , respectively. Additional expenses were attributed to increased equipment and herbicide costs to replace tillage operations and increased seed and herbicide costs for cover crop management. However, after biophysical soil health improvements were considered, additional costs were offset with savings from reduced irrigation needs, reduced fertilizer requirements, and reduced pesticide applications. Including increased yields attributed to soil health improvements, SHMS increased net farm income by $240 ha −1 compared to conventional systems. While positive changes to net farm income were achieved, the economic benefits are presented in a sequence of stages with soil health benefits enabling changes in production practices that reduced costs over time. Further research is needed to evaluate economic impact during the SHMS transition across more geographies and crops.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70342
Primary Topic
Research in Cotton Cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stages of farm profitability after soil health system adoption in Georgia cotton

Jessica Kelton, Archie Flanders, Cristine L. S. Morgan, Dianna K. Bagnall et al.
Agronomy Journal
Research in Cotton Cultivation
article

Stages of farm profitability after soil health system adoption in Georgia cotton

Jessica Kelton, Archie Flanders, Cristine L. S. Morgan, Dianna K. Bagnall, C. Wayne Honeycutt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soil health management systems (SHMS) that include reduced tillage and cover cropping can improve productivity and reduce inputs in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) systems. However, there is limited understanding about the economic impacts during the transition period from conventional systems to SHMS. We conducted interviews with eight cotton growers in Georgia and grouped related production changes into stages. Ordering the resulting stages of production change in a logical sequence of occurrence allowed us to assess the change in net farm income through the transition of adoption. Initial cost of adoption included reduced tillage, followed by cover cropping, and resulted in decreased net farm income by $3 and $74 ha −1 , respectively. Additional expenses were attributed to increased equipment and herbicide costs to replace tillage operations and increased seed and herbicide costs for cover crop management. However, after biophysical soil health improvements were considered, additional costs were offset with savings from reduced irrigation needs, reduced fertilizer requirements, and reduced pesticide applications. Including increased yields attributed to soil health improvements, SHMS increased net farm income by $240 ha −1 compared to conventional systems. While positive changes to net farm income were achieved, the economic benefits are presented in a sequence of stages with soil health benefits enabling changes in production practices that reduced costs over time. Further research is needed to evaluate economic impact during the SHMS transition across more geographies and crops.

Agronomy JournalVol. 118(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Research in Cotton Cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.