Combined machine learning - 3D physics based approach for building damage evaluation: the case of L’Aquila 2009

This work combines artificial intelligence tools and physics-based simulations with the aim to develop a hybrid tool to support pre- and post-earthquake emergency phases. As a case study, we examine the 6.1 Mw earthquake that struck and partially destroyed the city of L’Aquila and many surrounding villages on 6 April 2009. Numerical simulations were performed using SPEED (SPectral Elements in Elastodynamics with Discontinuous Galerkin), which is a spectral element based software, for earthquake simulation on local and regional scale. The simulated values of peak ground velocity and peak ground acceleration, together with those provided by ShakeMaps, are included in a dataset containing information on 3.060 buildings damaged during the 2009 earthquake. Three different damage distributions were considered, obtained from the six damage levels assigned in the original dataset, ranging from D0 (light or no damage) to D5 (heavy damage or collapse). The results show that the peak ground velocity and peak ground acceleration obtained from numerical simulations have a significantly greater impact on the level of damage recorded than those derived from ShakeMaps. In fact, simulated intensity measures are among the four most important features for all tests considered, while variables obtained from ShakeMaps do not even appear in the top twelve, consequently, they may not serve as a reliable proxy for building damage assessment. The simulated intensity measures have been used to assess the building damage reaching a maximum accuracy of the 83% on a balanced dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45377-5
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined machine learning - 3D physics based approach for building damage evaluation: the case of L’Aquila 2009

Chiara Smerzini, Bruno Rubino, Roberto Aloisio, Ilario Mazzieri et al.
Scientific Reports
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Combined machine learning - 3D physics based approach for building damage evaluation: the case of L’Aquila 2009

Chiara Smerzini, Bruno Rubino, Roberto Aloisio, Ilario Mazzieri, Pierangelo Marcati, Donato Pera, Federica Di Michele, Enrico Stagnini, Vanja Kastelic, M. M. C. Carafa
article en

Abstract

This work combines artificial intelligence tools and physics-based simulations with the aim to develop a hybrid tool to support pre- and post-earthquake emergency phases. As a case study, we examine the 6.1 Mw earthquake that struck and partially destroyed the city of L’Aquila and many surrounding villages on 6 April 2009. Numerical simulations were performed using SPEED (SPectral Elements in Elastodynamics with Discontinuous Galerkin), which is a spectral element based software, for earthquake simulation on local and regional scale. The simulated values of peak ground velocity and peak ground acceleration, together with those provided by ShakeMaps, are included in a dataset containing information on 3.060 buildings damaged during the 2009 earthquake. Three different damage distributions were considered, obtained from the six damage levels assigned in the original dataset, ranging from D0 (light or no damage) to D5 (heavy damage or collapse). The results show that the peak ground velocity and peak ground acceleration obtained from numerical simulations have a significantly greater impact on the level of damage recorded than those derived from ShakeMaps. In fact, simulated intensity measures are among the four most important features for all tests considered, while variables obtained from ShakeMaps do not even appear in the top twelve, consequently, they may not serve as a reliable proxy for building damage assessment. The simulated intensity measures have been used to assess the building damage reaching a maximum accuracy of the 83% on a balanced dataset.

Scientific Reports
University of L'Aquila (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), Gran Sasso Science Institute (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.