“I would walk through fire to get this vaccine”: a mixed-methods study examining attitudes and perceptions of a gonorrhoea vaccine programme among UK sexual health service users

Introduction Antimicrobial-resistant gonorrhoea poses a significant global public health threat. In response, the UK launched the world’s first gonorrhoea vaccination programme using a 4CMenB vaccine, targeting individuals at high risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Understanding attitudes and acceptability among sexual health service users is essential to inform successful implementation. Methods The NAVIGATE study employed a mixed-methods design, combining an online survey (n=395) with semi-structured interviews (n=15) among UK adults who had previously accessed sexual health services. The survey included demographic questions, the validated Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale and items assessing the acceptability of gonorrhoea vaccine. Interviews explored deeper perceptions of vaccination, trust and delivery preferences. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework. Results Participants showed high general vaccine confidence, with 92.2% strongly supporting a gonorrhoea vaccine programme. Acceptance was driven by concerns about antimicrobial resistance and trust in UK regulatory systems. Stigma and structural barriers, such as fear of judgement, cost and inconvenient delivery settings, were key factors influencing access. Participants favoured delivery through sexual health clinics and LGBTQ+ venues and strongly endorsed peer-led outreach. Partial efficacy of the proposed vaccine was accepted when transparently communicated. Concerns over personal costs emerged as potentially worsening inequalities. Conclusions While overall acceptability was high, successful uptake requires delivery that is trusted, stigma-free, accessible and clearly communicated. Policy recommendations include ensuring free access, leveraging peer-led campaigns and delivering vaccination in low-barrier settings. Monitoring by demographic group is essential to prevent inequities. These insights are crucial as the UK’s pioneering programme generates global evidence for future STI vaccine policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Public Health
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2025-003819
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I would walk through fire to get this vaccine”: a mixed-methods study examining attitudes and perceptions of a gonorrhoea vaccine programme among UK sexual health service users

Sam Martin, Samantha Vanderslott, Charlie Firth, Sophia Wilkinson et al.
BMJ Public Health
Reproductive tract infections research
article

“I would walk through fire to get this vaccine”: a mixed-methods study examining attitudes and perceptions of a gonorrhoea vaccine programme among UK sexual health service users

Sam Martin, Samantha Vanderslott, Charlie Firth, Sophia Wilkinson, Katrina M Pollock, Andrew J Pollard
article en

Abstract

Introduction Antimicrobial-resistant gonorrhoea poses a significant global public health threat. In response, the UK launched the world’s first gonorrhoea vaccination programme using a 4CMenB vaccine, targeting individuals at high risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Understanding attitudes and acceptability among sexual health service users is essential to inform successful implementation. Methods The NAVIGATE study employed a mixed-methods design, combining an online survey (n=395) with semi-structured interviews (n=15) among UK adults who had previously accessed sexual health services. The survey included demographic questions, the validated Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale and items assessing the acceptability of gonorrhoea vaccine. Interviews explored deeper perceptions of vaccination, trust and delivery preferences. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework. Results Participants showed high general vaccine confidence, with 92.2% strongly supporting a gonorrhoea vaccine programme. Acceptance was driven by concerns about antimicrobial resistance and trust in UK regulatory systems. Stigma and structural barriers, such as fear of judgement, cost and inconvenient delivery settings, were key factors influencing access. Participants favoured delivery through sexual health clinics and LGBTQ+ venues and strongly endorsed peer-led outreach. Partial efficacy of the proposed vaccine was accepted when transparently communicated. Concerns over personal costs emerged as potentially worsening inequalities. Conclusions While overall acceptability was high, successful uptake requires delivery that is trusted, stigma-free, accessible and clearly communicated. Policy recommendations include ensuring free access, leveraging peer-led campaigns and delivering vaccination in low-barrier settings. Monitoring by demographic group is essential to prevent inequities. These insights are crucial as the UK’s pioneering programme generates global evidence for future STI vaccine policy.

BMJ Public HealthVol. 4(1)
University of Oxford (GB), Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.