Using hybrid pore scale imaging/modelling and Minkowski functionals to assess the similarity of imbibition relative permeability for hydrogen, methane and nitrogen

Reservoir simulations to assess the feasibility of underground storage of hydrogen require hydrogen-brine relative permeability as input parameter. A central question is whether hydrogen relative permeability is significantly different than other gases such as methane or nitrogen, for which relative permeability data is more available/accessible. Here we present a novel hybrid workflow combining time-resolved in-situ pore scale imaging of hydrogen/brine flow experiments with numerical Stokes flow simulations conducted on the respective pore scale fluid distributions. The advantage is a much wider accessible mobile saturation range compared to conventional methods and a more robust estimate of uncertainty ranges. The similarity in the relative permeability of the three gases is established on the basis of Corey exponents and Minkowski functionals computed from the respective pore scale fluid configurations. Results do not support the view that hydrogen has different effective wetting properties than nitrogen and methane. • A novel method for determining hydrogen relative permeability is presented. • Imbibition relative permeability shows no significant differences for hydrogen, nitrogen and methane. • This finding is supported by Minkowski functionals of the pore scale fluid configuration of the three gasses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154730
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using hybrid pore scale imaging/modelling and Minkowski functionals to assess the similarity of imbibition relative permeability for hydrogen, methane and nitrogen

Shashank Tiwari, Ying Gao, Evren Unsal, Karin de Borst et al.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Using hybrid pore scale imaging/modelling and Minkowski functionals to assess the similarity of imbibition relative permeability for hydrogen, methane and nitrogen

Shashank Tiwari, Ying Gao, Evren Unsal, Karin de Borst, Stefania Moioli, Vishal Raju Ahuja, Eleonora Parente, Steffen Berg
article en

Abstract

Reservoir simulations to assess the feasibility of underground storage of hydrogen require hydrogen-brine relative permeability as input parameter. A central question is whether hydrogen relative permeability is significantly different than other gases such as methane or nitrogen, for which relative permeability data is more available/accessible. Here we present a novel hybrid workflow combining time-resolved in-situ pore scale imaging of hydrogen/brine flow experiments with numerical Stokes flow simulations conducted on the respective pore scale fluid distributions. The advantage is a much wider accessible mobile saturation range compared to conventional methods and a more robust estimate of uncertainty ranges. The similarity in the relative permeability of the three gases is established on the basis of Corey exponents and Minkowski functionals computed from the respective pore scale fluid configurations. Results do not support the view that hydrogen has different effective wetting properties than nitrogen and methane. • A novel method for determining hydrogen relative permeability is presented. • Imbibition relative permeability shows no significant differences for hydrogen, nitrogen and methane. • This finding is supported by Minkowski functionals of the pore scale fluid configuration of the three gasses.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 229
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Shell (Netherlands) (NL), Politecnico di Milano (IT), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.