Around But Not Close? Mapping Normative Trends in Cross-Race Contact During Adulthood
How do people form cross-race relationships in everyday life, and do people vary from each other in this process? Answering these questions can yield useful insights for scholars interested in encouraging cross-race contact. We investigated how people (<i>N</i> = 1,156 Bay Area adults) met their different-race (vs. same-race) contacts, the roles that different-race contacts occupied in their personal networks, and the content and quality of their relationships with their different-race contacts. We found that different-race contacts were, on average, "around but not close." They were met in less intimate settings; they occupied less intimate roles; and they were felt less close to. Importantly, processes varied across people. People who formed cross-race kin relationships were the most likely to have stable cross-race contact, and people who engaged in "high effort" activities with their different-race contacts (e.g., confiding in) had closer relationships with them. We highlight insights of these results for encouraging cross-race contact.
Authors
- Claude S. Fischer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-5630)
- Stephen Antonoplis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-5516)
Institutions
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Published
- 2026-03-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261427565
- Primary Topic
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00