Around But Not Close? Mapping Normative Trends in Cross-Race Contact During Adulthood

How do people form cross-race relationships in everyday life, and do people vary from each other in this process? Answering these questions can yield useful insights for scholars interested in encouraging cross-race contact. We investigated how people (<i>N</i> = 1,156 Bay Area adults) met their different-race (vs. same-race) contacts, the roles that different-race contacts occupied in their personal networks, and the content and quality of their relationships with their different-race contacts. We found that different-race contacts were, on average, "around but not close." They were met in less intimate settings; they occupied less intimate roles; and they were felt less close to. Importantly, processes varied across people. People who formed cross-race kin relationships were the most likely to have stable cross-race contact, and people who engaged in "high effort" activities with their different-race contacts (e.g., confiding in) had closer relationships with them. We highlight insights of these results for encouraging cross-race contact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261427565
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Around But Not Close? Mapping Normative Trends in Cross-Race Contact During Adulthood

Claude S. Fischer, Stephen Antonoplis
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Around But Not Close? Mapping Normative Trends in Cross-Race Contact During Adulthood

Claude S. Fischer, Stephen Antonoplis
article en

Abstract

How do people form cross-race relationships in everyday life, and do people vary from each other in this process? Answering these questions can yield useful insights for scholars interested in encouraging cross-race contact. We investigated how people (<i>N</i> = 1,156 Bay Area adults) met their different-race (vs. same-race) contacts, the roles that different-race contacts occupied in their personal networks, and the content and quality of their relationships with their different-race contacts. We found that different-race contacts were, on average, "around but not close." They were met in less intimate settings; they occupied less intimate roles; and they were felt less close to. Importantly, processes varied across people. People who formed cross-race kin relationships were the most likely to have stable cross-race contact, and people who engaged in "high effort" activities with their different-race contacts (e.g., confiding in) had closer relationships with them. We highlight insights of these results for encouraging cross-race contact.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of California, Riverside (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Around But Not Close? Mapping Normative Trends in Cross-Race Contact During Adulthood — Claude S. Fischer, Stephen Antonoplis · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS