When science meets geopolitics: global AI research network transformation (2000–2025)

Abstract Global AI research has shifted from an open, collaborative enterprise to a domain shaped by strategic rivalry. This study examines the evolution of international AI research collaboration networks from 2000 to 2025 through bibliometric and social network analysis of 1.4 million publications from the Web of Science. We identify four phases: a unipolar Western-led network (2000–2009), China’s rise and bipolar emergence (2010–2016), peak collaboration amid geopolitical strain (2017–2021), and strategic bifurcation (2022–2025). The findings reveal asymmetric centrality: China dominates in publication volume, while the US retains structural influence. Rather than emerging solely from intrinsic scientific dynamics, collaboration patterns are increasingly shaped by political interventions and techno-industrial strategies. Technological breakthroughs catalyse investment cycles that reshape global networks, while geopolitical forces disrupt established partnerships. The study highlights the policy imperative to support multi-polar research ecosystems, empower intermediary ‘bridge’ nations, and pursue nuanced strategies that balance competition with sustained international cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag017
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When science meets geopolitics: global AI research network transformation (2000–2025)

Zuanxu Chen, Shengpeng Wang, Yanhui Wei, Marina Yue Zhang
Science and Public Policy
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

When science meets geopolitics: global AI research network transformation (2000–2025)

Zuanxu Chen, Shengpeng Wang, Yanhui Wei, Marina Yue Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Global AI research has shifted from an open, collaborative enterprise to a domain shaped by strategic rivalry. This study examines the evolution of international AI research collaboration networks from 2000 to 2025 through bibliometric and social network analysis of 1.4 million publications from the Web of Science. We identify four phases: a unipolar Western-led network (2000–2009), China’s rise and bipolar emergence (2010–2016), peak collaboration amid geopolitical strain (2017–2021), and strategic bifurcation (2022–2025). The findings reveal asymmetric centrality: China dominates in publication volume, while the US retains structural influence. Rather than emerging solely from intrinsic scientific dynamics, collaboration patterns are increasingly shaped by political interventions and techno-industrial strategies. Technological breakthroughs catalyse investment cycles that reshape global networks, while geopolitical forces disrupt established partnerships. The study highlights the policy imperative to support multi-polar research ecosystems, empower intermediary ‘bridge’ nations, and pursue nuanced strategies that balance competition with sustained international cooperation.

Science and Public Policy
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Agriculture and Forestry University (NP), Sichuan Academy Of Social Sciences (CN), Shandong Institute of Business and Technology (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.