G/C-ending and synonymous codon bias define functional translational programs that shape human tissue and cancer proteomes

Abstract Codon usage bias is a fundamental feature of the genetic code, yet its impact on messenger RNA translation is incompletely defined. Here, we integrate comparative genomics, human tissue proteomes, large cancer cell line, and patient cancer datasets to reveal a conserved codon-bias axis. Across mammals, we show that GC-biased gene conversion drives human-specific GC3 (third codon nucleotide bias score) drifts, yet the functional dichotomy is maintained: A/T-ending codons associate with proliferation and RNA processing, while G/C-ending (Third nucleotide Guanine or Cytosine) codons associate with differentiation and neuronal functions. At the isoacceptors level, synonymous codons segregate into distinct functional categories. To mechanistically connect codon usage to cancer, we introduce the ANN- and m7G-indices, capturing codons decoded by transfer RNA (tRNA) modifications t6A and m7G. Both indices negatively correlate with GC3 and enrich for pro-oncogenic proliferative pathways. Human tissue proteomes reveal strong codon bias discordance between RNA and protein levels, with nervous system tissues enriched for G/C-ending codons while proliferative organs are A/T-biased. Analysis of 2600 cancer cell lines and 21 cancer types revealed heterogeneous codon preferences in cancer cell lines but a global A/T-ending shift in human cancer-upregulated proteins. These findings establish synonymous codon divergence and tRNA modification indices as key determinants of translational reprogramming in health and cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqag033
Primary Topic
RNA modifications and cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

G/C-ending and synonymous codon bias define functional translational programs that shape human tissue and cancer proteomes

Kuniyasu Niizuma, Sherif Rashad
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
RNA modifications and cancer
article

G/C-ending and synonymous codon bias define functional translational programs that shape human tissue and cancer proteomes

Kuniyasu Niizuma, Sherif Rashad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Codon usage bias is a fundamental feature of the genetic code, yet its impact on messenger RNA translation is incompletely defined. Here, we integrate comparative genomics, human tissue proteomes, large cancer cell line, and patient cancer datasets to reveal a conserved codon-bias axis. Across mammals, we show that GC-biased gene conversion drives human-specific GC3 (third codon nucleotide bias score) drifts, yet the functional dichotomy is maintained: A/T-ending codons associate with proliferation and RNA processing, while G/C-ending (Third nucleotide Guanine or Cytosine) codons associate with differentiation and neuronal functions. At the isoacceptors level, synonymous codons segregate into distinct functional categories. To mechanistically connect codon usage to cancer, we introduce the ANN- and m7G-indices, capturing codons decoded by transfer RNA (tRNA) modifications t6A and m7G. Both indices negatively correlate with GC3 and enrich for pro-oncogenic proliferative pathways. Human tissue proteomes reveal strong codon bias discordance between RNA and protein levels, with nervous system tissues enriched for G/C-ending codons while proliferative organs are A/T-biased. Analysis of 2600 cancer cell lines and 21 cancer types revealed heterogeneous codon preferences in cancer cell lines but a global A/T-ending shift in human cancer-upregulated proteins. These findings establish synonymous codon divergence and tRNA modification indices as key determinants of translational reprogramming in health and cancer.

NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsVol. 8(2)
Tohoku University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
RNA modifications and cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.