Institutional spillover effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance and <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> : a systematic review

Abstract Objective: To synthesize evidence on institutional spillover effects of antimicrobial use (AMU) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and Clostridioides difficile infections on individuals without direct antimicrobial exposure. Design: Systematic review. Methods: Three databases were searched through August 2024 for studies evaluating spillover effects of AMU on unexposed individuals in institutional settings. Study characteristics, AMU, and outcomes were extracted. Study quality was assessed based on underlying methodology to detect spillover effect. A hybrid synthesis, including effect direction and meta-analysis of studies reporting continuous AMU and non-aggregate outcomes was utilized. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. Results: Of 5916 screened studies, five observational studies met inclusion criteria. Three were conducted across 68 hospital wards (ward-level exposure), and two across 693 nursing homes (facility-level exposure). Three studies evaluated all antimicrobial classes; two focused on penicillins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems. Two studies examined C. difficile , one MRSA, one carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales , and one reported combined AMR and C. difficile outcomes. Low to moderate quality evidence indicated a positive spillover effect direction with increasing facility AMU. Meta-analysis of three studies yielded a pooled IRR of 1.54 (95% CI 0.85–2.80) per 100 days of therapy per 1,000 patient-days, with significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 97.6%). Conclusions: This review identified five studies suggesting a positive association between institutional AMU and collateral risks of AMR and C. difficile among unexposed individuals. Findings were limited by methodological heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Standardizing terminology, specifying spillover mechanisms, and adopting robust observational designs can enhance future research on spillover effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10318
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional spillover effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance and Clostridioides difficile : a systematic review

Sumit Raybardhan, Nick Daneman, Karen Brown, Bradley J Langford et al.
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Institutional spillover effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance and Clostridioides difficile : a systematic review

Sumit Raybardhan, Nick Daneman, Karen Brown, Bradley J Langford, Kevin L. Schwartz, Russell Forrest, Derek R. Macfadden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To synthesize evidence on institutional spillover effects of antimicrobial use (AMU) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and Clostridioides difficile infections on individuals without direct antimicrobial exposure. Design: Systematic review. Methods: Three databases were searched through August 2024 for studies evaluating spillover effects of AMU on unexposed individuals in institutional settings. Study characteristics, AMU, and outcomes were extracted. Study quality was assessed based on underlying methodology to detect spillover effect. A hybrid synthesis, including effect direction and meta-analysis of studies reporting continuous AMU and non-aggregate outcomes was utilized. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. Results: Of 5916 screened studies, five observational studies met inclusion criteria. Three were conducted across 68 hospital wards (ward-level exposure), and two across 693 nursing homes (facility-level exposure). Three studies evaluated all antimicrobial classes; two focused on penicillins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems. Two studies examined C. difficile , one MRSA, one carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales , and one reported combined AMR and C. difficile outcomes. Low to moderate quality evidence indicated a positive spillover effect direction with increasing facility AMU. Meta-analysis of three studies yielded a pooled IRR of 1.54 (95% CI 0.85–2.80) per 100 days of therapy per 1,000 patient-days, with significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 97.6%). Conclusions: This review identified five studies suggesting a positive association between institutional AMU and collateral risks of AMR and C. difficile among unexposed individuals. Findings were limited by methodological heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Standardizing terminology, specifying spillover mechanisms, and adopting robust observational designs can enhance future research on spillover effects.

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare EpidemiologyVol. 6(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.