Detection of macrovesicular steatosis in hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological images of human livers: A feature-based method

Macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) affects liver transplant outcomes. Traditional visual biopsy assessment is subjective and shows inter-observer variability (weighted κ = 0.595 in our cohort), which complicates allocation and prognostication. We developed a semi-automated image analysis method using HALCON Progress (evaluation license, 2019–2023) to quantify MaS in H&E whole-slide images (WSIs). The pipeline processes native SVS files at full resolution (average runtime 1.26 ± 0.53 min/WSI) without tiling, downsampling, or format conversion. Four shape features (area, roundness, circularity, and compactness) guide classification. Results were compared with three specialized pathologists using Pearson and Spearman correlations. Across 129 WSIs (≈52,000 lipid droplets), artificial intelligence–pathologist correlations were statistically significant (Pearson r = 0.526–0.642; Spearman ρ = 0.498–0.615; all p < 0.001; n = 48–95 per pathologist). Correlation with the mean pathologist assessment reached R 2 = 0.64 ( r = 0.80, ρ = 0.782), within the inter-pathologist range (R 2 = 0.34–0.62; weighted κ = 0.595). Using four shape features, the pipeline separates vacuoles from vessels and processing artifacts during interactive review. Processing native SVS at full resolution avoids extra compute while preserving precision. The method provides a rapid, objective readout of MaS and performs on par with inter-pathologist agreement (R 2 = 0.64 vs. weighted κ = 0.595). It is best used as decision-support that supplies percentages and overlays for expert review. Main limitations are underestimation in severe, confluent steatosis (>30%), limited coverage of microvesicular fat, and single-center validation. Multi-center evidence across scanners and patient groups is still needed before routine use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2026.100656
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of macrovesicular steatosis in hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological images of human livers: A feature-based method

U. Neumann, F. Nensa, K. Willuweit, D.P. Hoyer et al.
Journal of Pathology Informatics
AI in cancer detection
article

Detection of macrovesicular steatosis in hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological images of human livers: A feature-based method

U. Neumann, F. Nensa, K. Willuweit, D.P. Hoyer, J. Haubold, S. Theurer, J.-W. Treckmann, J. Rashidi-Alavijeh, E. Malamutmann, M. Platte, A. Özcelik, M. Jalc
article en

Abstract

Macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) affects liver transplant outcomes. Traditional visual biopsy assessment is subjective and shows inter-observer variability (weighted κ = 0.595 in our cohort), which complicates allocation and prognostication. We developed a semi-automated image analysis method using HALCON Progress (evaluation license, 2019–2023) to quantify MaS in H&E whole-slide images (WSIs). The pipeline processes native SVS files at full resolution (average runtime 1.26 ± 0.53 min/WSI) without tiling, downsampling, or format conversion. Four shape features (area, roundness, circularity, and compactness) guide classification. Results were compared with three specialized pathologists using Pearson and Spearman correlations. Across 129 WSIs (≈52,000 lipid droplets), artificial intelligence–pathologist correlations were statistically significant (Pearson r = 0.526–0.642; Spearman ρ = 0.498–0.615; all p < 0.001; n = 48–95 per pathologist). Correlation with the mean pathologist assessment reached R 2 = 0.64 ( r = 0.80, ρ = 0.782), within the inter-pathologist range (R 2 = 0.34–0.62; weighted κ = 0.595). Using four shape features, the pipeline separates vacuoles from vessels and processing artifacts during interactive review. Processing native SVS at full resolution avoids extra compute while preserving precision. The method provides a rapid, objective readout of MaS and performs on par with inter-pathologist agreement (R 2 = 0.64 vs. weighted κ = 0.595). It is best used as decision-support that supplies percentages and overlays for expert review. Main limitations are underestimation in severe, confluent steatosis (>30%), limited coverage of microvesicular fat, and single-center validation. Multi-center evidence across scanners and patient groups is still needed before routine use.

Journal of Pathology Informatics
Essen University Hospital (DE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.