The Impact of Anticoagulation in Patients With Isolated Cancer‐Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Dual‐Center Cohort Study

Data to guide management of isolated bland cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis (CA-SpVT) are limited. We aimed to assess the role of anticoagulation (AC) and bleeding and thrombosis in patients with CA-SpVT. We conducted a dual-center retrospective cohort study of adults with incident, isolated, bland CA-SpVT from 2011 to 2020. The primary outcome was major bleeding (MB); other outcomes included usual-site venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and progression/recanalization of CA-SpVT. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed with weighted Cox models adjusting for cancer type, stage, SpVT location, and whether symptomatic. For SpVT recanalization/progression, differences were estimated using weighted average treatment effects (ATEs). After excluding tumor thrombus, we included 437 patients with notable characteristics of median age 60 years, portal vein thrombosis (81.2%), and underlying hepatocellular cancer (35.9%). Of these, 29.5% received therapeutic AC. At 6 months, there were 11.9% MB and 6.4% incident usual-site VTE events. Among 308 patients with follow-up imaging, the 1-year thrombus progression rate was 19.8% and thrombus recanalization was 28.6%. In the adjusted analysis, there were numerically higher rates of MB with AC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-3.87) and no significant difference in the incidence of VTE (aHR 1.41, 95% CI 0.56-3.51). AC was associated with significantly higher likelihood of venous recanalization (ATE +24% 95% CI 13%-35%) and significantly lower likelihood of thrombus progression (ATE -14% 95% CI -23% to -5%). In patients with isolated bland CA-SpVT, AC was associated with thrombus recanalization and limited thrombus progression; effects were offset by a potentially higher risk of MB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hematology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70287
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Anticoagulation in Patients With Isolated Cancer‐Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Dual‐Center Cohort Study

Jeffrey I. Zwicker, Hanqing Shang, Rushad Patell, M. Andersen et al.
American Journal of Hematology
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

The Impact of Anticoagulation in Patients With Isolated Cancer‐Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Dual‐Center Cohort Study

Jeffrey I. Zwicker, Hanqing Shang, Rushad Patell, M. Andersen, DANIELLE GUFFEY, Abhilasha Borad, Maria J. Fernandez Turizo, Jun Y. Jiang, Jonathan Berry, Ang Li
article en

Abstract

Data to guide management of isolated bland cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis (CA-SpVT) are limited. We aimed to assess the role of anticoagulation (AC) and bleeding and thrombosis in patients with CA-SpVT. We conducted a dual-center retrospective cohort study of adults with incident, isolated, bland CA-SpVT from 2011 to 2020. The primary outcome was major bleeding (MB); other outcomes included usual-site venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and progression/recanalization of CA-SpVT. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed with weighted Cox models adjusting for cancer type, stage, SpVT location, and whether symptomatic. For SpVT recanalization/progression, differences were estimated using weighted average treatment effects (ATEs). After excluding tumor thrombus, we included 437 patients with notable characteristics of median age 60 years, portal vein thrombosis (81.2%), and underlying hepatocellular cancer (35.9%). Of these, 29.5% received therapeutic AC. At 6 months, there were 11.9% MB and 6.4% incident usual-site VTE events. Among 308 patients with follow-up imaging, the 1-year thrombus progression rate was 19.8% and thrombus recanalization was 28.6%. In the adjusted analysis, there were numerically higher rates of MB with AC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-3.87) and no significant difference in the incidence of VTE (aHR 1.41, 95% CI 0.56-3.51). AC was associated with significantly higher likelihood of venous recanalization (ATE +24% 95% CI 13%-35%) and significantly lower likelihood of thrombus progression (ATE -14% 95% CI -23% to -5%). In patients with isolated bland CA-SpVT, AC was associated with thrombus recanalization and limited thrombus progression; effects were offset by a potentially higher risk of MB.

American Journal of Hematology
University of Southern California (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Cornell University (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), Houston Institute for Clinical Research (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.