EMERGE: Early antiMicrobial stEwaRdship for GEneral medicine patients—targeting inpatient intravenous therapy greater than 24 hours

Abstract Objective: Early review of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy is central to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), however scalable models for general medical patients are limited. We evaluated a pharmacist-led digital intervention to optimize IV antimicrobial prescribing. Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted between May 2022 to February 2023 across six general medicine units at a tertiary hospital. AMS recommendations were delivered electronically via Microsoft Teams®. Adult inpatients receiving IV antimicrobials for >24 hours were included, excluding those with COVID-19, under Infectious Diseases consultation or receiving palliative care. The primary outcome was median IV antimicrobial duration. Secondary outcomes included AMS recommendation type, recommendation acceptance, length of stay (LOS), 30-day infection-related readmission, IV therapy recommencement, and inpatient mortality. Antibacterial consumption was analyzed from July 2021 to through December 2024 to evaluate sustained impact. Results: Among 723 antimicrobial orders (474 treatment episodes in 458 patients), median IV duration was comparable between phases (intensive: 2.75 days; baseline: 3.00 days). LOS was shorter during the intensive phase compared to baseline (5.5 vs 7.6 days; P = .04), particularly in patients without bacteremia. Readmissions and mortality were unchanged. Of 400 AMS recommendations, 67% were IV-to-oral switches; overall acceptance was 78%. Piperacillin-tazobactam use declined, and sustained reductions in aminoglycosides, ampicillin and IV flucloxacillin were observed. A reduction in total antibiotic prescribing (combined IV and oral prescribing) was also observed. Conclusions: The digital pharmacist-led AMS intervention did not reduce IV duration, likely reflecting strong baseline prescribing, but was associated with shorter LOS and a reduction in total antibacterial use. This program offered a scalable, sustainable alternative to resource-intensive face-to-face models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10313
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EMERGE: Early antiMicrobial stEwaRdship for GEneral medicine patients—targeting inpatient intravenous therapy greater than 24 hours

Ashmitha Thomas, Sara Vogrin, A Batrouney, S Motaganahalli et al.
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

EMERGE: Early antiMicrobial stEwaRdship for GEneral medicine patients—targeting inpatient intravenous therapy greater than 24 hours

Ashmitha Thomas, Sara Vogrin, A Batrouney, S Motaganahalli, Jason A. Trubiano, Shayne Camilleri, Nick Jones, Sharmila Khumra, Kate Lowe, Gemma Reynolds
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Early review of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy is central to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), however scalable models for general medical patients are limited. We evaluated a pharmacist-led digital intervention to optimize IV antimicrobial prescribing. Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted between May 2022 to February 2023 across six general medicine units at a tertiary hospital. AMS recommendations were delivered electronically via Microsoft Teams®. Adult inpatients receiving IV antimicrobials for >24 hours were included, excluding those with COVID-19, under Infectious Diseases consultation or receiving palliative care. The primary outcome was median IV antimicrobial duration. Secondary outcomes included AMS recommendation type, recommendation acceptance, length of stay (LOS), 30-day infection-related readmission, IV therapy recommencement, and inpatient mortality. Antibacterial consumption was analyzed from July 2021 to through December 2024 to evaluate sustained impact. Results: Among 723 antimicrobial orders (474 treatment episodes in 458 patients), median IV duration was comparable between phases (intensive: 2.75 days; baseline: 3.00 days). LOS was shorter during the intensive phase compared to baseline (5.5 vs 7.6 days; P = .04), particularly in patients without bacteremia. Readmissions and mortality were unchanged. Of 400 AMS recommendations, 67% were IV-to-oral switches; overall acceptance was 78%. Piperacillin-tazobactam use declined, and sustained reductions in aminoglycosides, ampicillin and IV flucloxacillin were observed. A reduction in total antibiotic prescribing (combined IV and oral prescribing) was also observed. Conclusions: The digital pharmacist-led AMS intervention did not reduce IV duration, likely reflecting strong baseline prescribing, but was associated with shorter LOS and a reduction in total antibacterial use. This program offered a scalable, sustainable alternative to resource-intensive face-to-face models.

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare EpidemiologyVol. 6(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Royal Darwin Hospital (AU), Austin Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.