SRS383 - Systematic review of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases

Abstract Introduction Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is an established treatment for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. Traditionally performed via laparotomy, recent advances in minimally invasive techniques have enabled a laparoscopic approach (L-CRS + HIPEC). This systematic review evaluates the current literature on L-CRS + HIPEC, focusing on perioperative morbidity, postoperative recovery, oncologic outcomes, and time to chemotherapy (TTC), to determine its feasibility and effectiveness. Methods A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science (Nov–Dec 2024) identified studies reporting outcomes of L-CRS + HIPEC in adults with peritoneal malignancyy. Both comparative and non-comparative studies were included. Outcomes of interest were morbidity, length of stay, TTC, and long-term oncologic endpoints. Results Nine studies comprising 482 patients were included. L-CRS + HIPEC was associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and earlier TTC. Rates of complete cytoreduction (CC0–1) were comparable to, or higher than, those reported for open CRS + HIPEC. In comparative studies, no significant differences were observed in recurrence, disease-free survival, or overall survival, though sample sizes and follow-up durations were limited. Conclusions L-CRS + HIPEC appears safe and feasible in selected patients, with potential advantages in perioperative outcomes and earlier chemotherapy resumption. Reported oncologic outcomes are comparable to open surgery, though evidence remains limited by small samples, retrospective designs, and short follow-up. Larger prospective trials are required to validate findings and refine patient selection before L-CRS + HIPEC can be confidently recommended as a standard approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.339
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS383 - Systematic review of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases

William English, Hao Long, Christopher Smith
British journal of surgery
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

SRS383 - Systematic review of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases

William English, Hao Long, Christopher Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is an established treatment for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. Traditionally performed via laparotomy, recent advances in minimally invasive techniques have enabled a laparoscopic approach (L-CRS + HIPEC). This systematic review evaluates the current literature on L-CRS + HIPEC, focusing on perioperative morbidity, postoperative recovery, oncologic outcomes, and time to chemotherapy (TTC), to determine its feasibility and effectiveness. Methods A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science (Nov–Dec 2024) identified studies reporting outcomes of L-CRS + HIPEC in adults with peritoneal malignancyy. Both comparative and non-comparative studies were included. Outcomes of interest were morbidity, length of stay, TTC, and long-term oncologic endpoints. Results Nine studies comprising 482 patients were included. L-CRS + HIPEC was associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and earlier TTC. Rates of complete cytoreduction (CC0–1) were comparable to, or higher than, those reported for open CRS + HIPEC. In comparative studies, no significant differences were observed in recurrence, disease-free survival, or overall survival, though sample sizes and follow-up durations were limited. Conclusions L-CRS + HIPEC appears safe and feasible in selected patients, with potential advantages in perioperative outcomes and earlier chemotherapy resumption. Reported oncologic outcomes are comparable to open surgery, though evidence remains limited by small samples, retrospective designs, and short follow-up. Larger prospective trials are required to validate findings and refine patient selection before L-CRS + HIPEC can be confidently recommended as a standard approach.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
Lancaster City Council (GB), Cleveland Clinic London (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.